Two Balls Dropped: Separate or Together?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkSun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics problem of two balls dropped one on top of the other. The initial assumption is that the bottom ball hits the ground first, allowing for a simplified analysis. Participants clarify that while both balls experience the same acceleration, treating them as separate for calculations does not affect the final result. The deformation of the balls during the impact is noted, but it is emphasized that this complexity does not change the outcome. Ultimately, the method of analyzing the situation in stages is justified as a practical approach.
darkSun
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In this problem: http://www.physics.harvard.edu/academics/undergrad/probweek/prob1.pdf

Two balls are dropped, one on top of each other. When figuring out how high the top ball bounces, the solution assumes that the bottom ball hits the ground first, without the other ball on top of it.

I thought that ideally the two balls would stay on top of each other, since they experience the same acceleration, and would both "hit" at the same time. Is something wrong with my thinking?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
darkSun said:
I thought that ideally the two balls would stay on top of each other, since they experience the same acceleration, and would both "hit" at the same time. Is something wrong with my thinking?

Hello darkSun! :smile:

No, you're right …

but it doesn't make any difference to the result if we split the equations into two stages …

and since that's easier, that's exactly what we do! :wink:

(technically, of course, the balls deform, and the top of the lower ball doesn't "know" that the bottom has hit the ground until shortly afterwards!)
 
Oh, I see!

It really doesn't make a difference? Seems weird, but I'll try that.

Thank you for the help tiny-tim.
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Pool Ball Physics: Questions on Impact Spins
Replies
5
Views
3K
Terminal velocity of two balls with different masses
Replies
22
Views
22K
Throwing a ball sideways vs. dropping it
Replies
3
Views
3K
Newton's cradle: Glue balls together
Replies
2
Views
3K
Impulse of Dropped Balls: Higher Heights Explained
Replies
2
Views
1K
Two balls dropped from the same height
Replies
11
Views
10K
"Air Pressure" is not "the weight of the air above you"
Replies
27
Views
4K
What Does Negative Potential Energy Indicate in Colliding Iron Balls in Space?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Coriolis effect example: ball tossing on rotating carousel
Replies
10
Views
6K
Momentum, Energy, and Elastic Collisions
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top