Dual harmonic oscillators connected by shear spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the development of an earthquake simulator using a model of interconnected spring-sliders to simulate earthquake rupture dynamics. The researcher is grappling with formulating the equations of motion for the system, particularly concerning the parameters ΔL1 and ΔL2, which represent spring displacements. There is an acknowledgment of the need for damping to account for friction losses, and suggestions are made to consult with experts in acoustics and the seismology/rheology community for guidance. The importance of finite element analysis in similar modeling efforts is also highlighted. Overall, the researcher seeks direction to better understand the underlying mechanics of their proposed model.
samu0034
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, looking around I have faith that the members of this forum will be able to point me in the right direction, and I apologize if it's more basic than I'm giving it credit for.

I'm an experimental researcher in rock mechanics, but I've always been fascinated by elasto-dymamic numerical modelling of earthquake rupture nucleation and propagation. To that end, I'm trying to build an earthquake simulator, which in my vision is basically an inter-connected sheet of spring-sliders, each connected to the one ahead/behind it with a spring of stiffness equivalent to the Young's Modulus, and the the slider on either side by a spring equivalent to the Shear Modulus. Not being a master of this sort of thing though, I'm starting from first principles, and this problem which I've posed to myself has me stumped… Below is a diagram of what I'd like to model, and below that is a brief description of my own progress on the whole thing. A point in the right direction is what I'm hoping for.

Also, please feel free to move this thread if this is the incorrect place to pose such a question.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/593/screenshot20130612at411.png/
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

If I sum up the forces on the left mass (m1), I get...

m_1 a_1 = m_1 g - K_1 (\Delta L_1 + x_1) - \gamma (\frac{dx_1}{dt}) + K_3 ((\Delta L_2 + x_2) - (\Delta L_1 + x_1))

Where the...
  • 1st term right of the equal sign is the acceleration of m_1 due to gravity
  • 2nd term is the resistance of the spring K_1 due to the stretch of the added mass and any additional displacement
  • 3rd term is a viscous damping term (which I'm happy to ignore as once everything else is solved I presume it'd be trivial to add this back in)
  • 4th term is the additional loading supplied by the shear spring due to the differential between the position of m_1 and m_2 (I'm not at all certain this is formulated correctly)

And there would be a similar equation for the acceleration of m_2. I can solve the above equation for a_1, and I get...

a_1 = \frac{d^2 x_1}{dt^2} = \frac{m_1 g - K_1 (\Delta L_1 + x_1) - \gamma (\frac{dx_1}{dt}) + K_3 ((\Delta L_2 + x_2) - (\Delta L_1 + x_1))}{m_1}
= g - \frac{K_1}{m_1} (\Delta L_1 + x_1) - \frac{\gamma}{m_1} (\frac{dx_1}{dt}) + \frac{K_3}{m_1} ((\Delta L_2 + x_2) - (\Delta L_1 + x_1))

Which, grand scheme of things, is pretty easy to solve numerically. Except that I don't know what \Delta L_1 and \Delta L_2 are.

My research group isn't really focused on this sort of thing, so I don't have anyone to bounce questions like this off of. Any help this community can provide will be greatly appreciated. Maybe I'm over thinking this, maybe I'm missing something entirely. I feel like it's a bit of both.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Masses and springs are not enough. You need to add dampers (dashpots) to account for the friction losses (viscosity).
Find an acoustics expert; they deal with systems like this all the time.
 
Hi Alfred,

Yeah, I know that in order to make it into my "earthquake simulator" I will have to add in some sort of damping term to account for friction, but since this isn't really my area of expertise I'm REALLY starting from first principles. Modeling simple harmonic motion, modeling a "simple" 2 mass - 2 springs-in-series system, and now I'm trying to model this shear loaded springs-in-parallel system. This is all just so I understand how all of the loading works when I add in some sort of frictional resistance.

I do appreciate the advice of seeking out an acoustics expert, that seems like a sound recommendation.

[EDIT] Holy crap, I didn't even notice that pun... terrible... I'm ashamed.
 
Last edited:
I love your pun. Take credit for it even if it was unconscious.
 
Suggest you look in the seismology/rheology community. I'd be very surprised if what you are attempting hasn't already been done. Search under 'finite element analysis'
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top