Duality Pairing and Functionals

AI Thread Summary
Duality pairing in the context of functionals relates to the interaction between a functional and its gradient. The discussion highlights a specific formula involving the limit of a functional's derivative, suggesting that the gradient DF(u) is indeed a functional. There is clarification that while DF(u) can be viewed as a functional, its application in an inner product context yields a real number. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear communication when discussing complex mathematical concepts. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the underlying principles of duality pairing in functional analysis.
maros522
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

does anybody know what means duality pairing in connection with functional. For example limE\rightarrow0\frac{\partial}{\partialE}F(u+Ev)=<DF(u),v>. Where F is functional F:K\rightarrowR.

Thank You for answers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
please write with proper formatting .. it is not possible to guess what you mean ...
 
Hello, I find definition of duality pairing in book
http://books.google.cz/books?id=zTV...onepage&q=duality pairing functional&f=false"
The part of interest is as jpg in attachments - dualitypairing1.jpg
But in book Contact problem in elasticity from Oden and Kikuchi is definition like in dualitypairing2.jpg.
In dualitypairing2.jpg is used as functional gradient of functional F at u. I don't understand how it is meaned. If g is part of V' we write g(v)=<g,v>: in this the g is functional. But in dualitypairing2.jpg is DF(u), which is gradient of F at u. This DF(u) is still functional or is it a value.
 

Attachments

  • dualitypairing1.jpg
    dualitypairing1.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 469
  • dualitypairing2.jpg
    dualitypairing2.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 514
Last edited by a moderator:
nobody will bother replying to you if you don't make any effort to clarify what u r asking.
 
DF(u) is a functional. Think of it this way: the gradient of a function takes a point and gives you back a vector. The inner product on euclidean space allows you to transform that vector into a function.
 
Thank you for posting messages.
Nirax: the question was "This DF(u) is still functional or is it a value?" I forget to add ?.
Zhentil: The inner product on euclidean space is dot product of two vectors. So the result will be real number. How do you think it?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top