MHB Dv's question at Yahoo Answers (Hermitian matrix)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the properties of Hermitian matrices A and B, specifically focusing on the expressions (AB + BA) and (AB - BA). It confirms that the Hermitian conjugate of (AB + BA) is equal to itself, proving that this expression is Hermitian. Conversely, the Hermitian conjugate of (AB - BA) results in a skew-Hermitian matrix. The response utilizes established properties of the Hermitian conjugate to validate these conclusions. Overall, it clarifies the nature of these matrix operations in the context of Hermitian matrices.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

A and B are 2 matrices. Normally I use a dagger symbol for the Hermitian conjugate; here I'll use a £ sign as I have no dagger symbol.

If I have a matrix (AB+BA), then take the hermitian conjugte (AB + BA)£, does that mean:

(AB+BA)£=AB£+BA£

So, if A and B are hermitian, then (AB-BA) and (AB+BA) are also hermitian, right?

Here is a link to the question:

Hermitian matrix question? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Dv,

For all $A,B\in \mathbb{C^{n\times n}}$ hermitian matrices, and using well known properties of the ${}^\dagger$ operator: $$\begin{aligned}(AB+BA)^\dagger&=(AB)^\dagger+(BA)^\dagger\\&=B^\dagger A^\dagger +A^\dagger B^\dagger\\&=BA+AB\\&=AB+BA\\&\Rightarrow AB+BA\mbox{ is hermitian}\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned}(AB-BA)^\dagger&=(AB)^\dagger-(BA)^\dagger\\&=B^\dagger A^\dagger -A^\dagger B^\dagger\\&=BA-AB\\&=-(AB-BA)\\&\Rightarrow AB-BA\mbox{ is skew-hermitian}\end{aligned}$$ If you have further questions, you can post them in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f14/ section.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top