Dynamics, Coefficient of Friction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the coefficients of friction between a load and a flat-bed trailer. Participants explore how to determine the shortest stopping distance of the rig while ensuring the load does not shift. The conversation includes aspects of dynamics, friction, and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to begin solving the problem, suggesting the use of the coefficient of friction to find the acceleration of the box.
  • Another participant questions which coefficient of friction to use, highlighting the distinction between static and kinetic friction.
  • Some participants propose using the coefficient of static friction since the box is intended to remain stationary relative to the trailer during deceleration.
  • There is a discussion about the lack of answers in the textbook, which adds to the frustration of the participants.
  • One participant presents a detailed calculation for the stopping distance, using the static friction coefficient to find acceleration and applying kinematic equations.
  • Another participant confirms the calculations but suggests rounding the final answer for significant figures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of static friction for the calculations, but there is some uncertainty regarding the initial approach and the handling of units. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact stopping distance and the appropriateness of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the coefficients of friction and the potential impact of unit conversions. Additionally, the lack of a definitive answer in the textbook contributes to the uncertainty in the problem-solving process.

CursedAntagonis
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The coefficients of friction between the load and the flat-bed trailer shown are [tex]\mu[/tex]s = 0.40 and [tex]\mu[/tex]k = 0.30. Knowing that the speed of the rig is 45 mi/h, determine the shortest distance in which the rig can be brough to a stop if the load is not to shift.

The drawing shows a box sitting a top of a trailer bed with a distance of 10' between the box and the cabin.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not really sure how to begin this problem. I am thinking using the coefficient of friction I can find the acceleration of the box and use that to find the distance needed for the truck to stop, but I am not sure.

So far I have used the [tex]\mu[/tex]k to find the acceleration of the box if it was to move, and was able to find the velocity of the box if it were to move.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CursedAntagonis said:
I am thinking using the coefficient of friction I can find the acceleration of the box and use that to find the distance needed for the truck to stop, but I am not sure.
yes, but which coefficient would you use, and why?
So far I have used the [tex]\mu[/tex]k to find the acceleration of the box if it was to move, and was able to find the velocity of the box if it were to move.
But if the load is not to shift, it's not supposed to move relative to the flatbed.
 
PhanthomJay said:
yes, but which coefficient would you use, and why?

I am guessing that would be static friction since the box is to stand still while the truck is to slow down and stop.

So if I to use the coefficient of static friction to find the acceleration, and use that acceleration to find the distance it takes for the truck to stop that would be the answer?

It is a bit frustrating that the book does not have the answer to this question, it has the answer for both odds and evens and yet somehow this number is omitted.
 
CursedAntagonis said:
I am guessing that would be static friction since the box is to stand still while the truck is to slow down and stop.

So if I to use the coefficient of static friction to find the acceleration, and use that acceleration to find the distance it takes for the truck to stop that would be the answer?
yes...but watch your units
It is a bit frustrating that the book does not have the answer to this question, it has the answer for both odds and evens and yet somehow this number is omitted.
so watch your math...
 
PhanthomJay said:
yes...but watch your unitsso watch your math...

Thanks. When I find the solution, would you mind double checking my work? I will post my work.
 
CursedAntagonis said:
Thanks. When I find the solution, would you mind double checking my work? I will post my work.
Not at all. But it won't be 'til morning. maybe someone else will check it if it's urgent...but it's Sunday, and nothing is due on Sunday...
 
PhanthomJay said:
Not at all. But it won't be 'til morning. maybe someone else will check it if it's urgent...but it's Sunday, and nothing is due on Sunday...

So here is what I have got so far:

F=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)N
N=mg

F=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)(m)(g)
ma=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)(m)(g)

the mass cancels out and thus
a=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)(g)
a=(0.40)(32.2ft/s^2)
a=12.88 ft/s^2

Converting the 45 mi/h gives us 66 ft/s, and using the acceleration found in the equation V^2=Vo^2+2a(X-Xo):

0=(66ft/s)^2+2(12.88 ft/s^2)(-X) gives us
X=169.1 feet.

This is the shortest distance for the truck to stop.

Does that sound about right? Thanks for going over my work.
 
Last edited:
CursedAntagonis said:
So here is what I have got so far:

F=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)N
N=mg

F=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)(m)(g)
ma=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)(m)(g)

the mass cancels out and thus
a=([tex]\mu[/tex]s)(g)
a=(0.40)(32.2ft/s^2)
a=12.88 ft/s^2

Converting the 45 mi/h gives us 66 ft/s, and using the acceleration found in the equation V^2=Vo^2+2a(X-Xo):

0=(66ft/s)^2+2(12.88 ft/s^2)(-X) gives us
X=169.1 feet.

This is the shortest distance for the truck to stop.

Does that sound about right? Thanks for going over my work.
Yes, good job; just round off your answer to 170 feet (2 significant figures).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K