Dynamics of Clifford generators

tallphil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Trying to find the correct forum to post this, trying here because it is for a review essay I'm writing..

I've been trying to follow a proof in this paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4050v2" (page 9).

The relevant build up:
c_\mu are Clifford algebra generators, i.e. \{c_\mu,c_\nu\}=2\delta_{\mu\nu}I

Consider a Hamiltonian of the form:
H=i\displaystyle\sum\limits_{\mu\ne\nu=1}^{2n}h_{\mu\nu}c_\mu c_\nu
where h_{\mu\nu} is a real antisymmetric 2nx2n matrix of coefficients.

Then write c_\mu as c_\mu(0) and define c_\mu(t)=U(t)c_\mu(0)U(t)^\dagger with U(t)=e^{iHt}.

It can then be shown that \frac{dc_\mu(t)}{dt}=i[H,c_\mu(t)]=\displaystyle\sum\limits_\nu 4h_{\mu\nu}c_\nu(t)

The part that is not clear to me is then to hence show that
c_\mu(t)=\displaystyle\sum\limits_\nu e^{4h_{\mu\nu}t}c_\nu(0)
in that I cannot differentiate this expression to get back to the previous line, let alone integrate the previous line to get this one (if that is indeed what is necessary).

Any help would be deeply appreciated, I have wasted far too much time today staring at this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the paper intends the expression e^(4ht) to be the matrix exponential. I.e. e^(4ht)=1+4ht+(4ht)^2/2!+(4ht)^3/3!+... where the powers are matrix multiplication. That's not the same as exponentiating each entry in the matrix.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top