What Governs the Dynamics of Phase Transitions in Materials?

Click For Summary
Phase transitions in materials occur when the pressure, temperature, and chemical potential of two phases are equal, with the free enthalpy ΔG determining phase equilibrium. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding why phase changes appear abrupt at specific temperatures and pressures, despite thermodynamic laws suggesting continuity. It notes that macroscopic systems exhibit this discontinuous behavior, while microscopic systems experience smooth transitions. The Landau theory of phase transitions is mentioned as a framework that explains these phenomena, particularly in second-order transitions, where the free energy function changes shape at the transition temperature. Understanding these dynamics is essential for grasping the underlying principles of phase transitions in materials.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I'm merely starting to research this field. Phase transitions have always been a mystery for me. Which kinds of dynamics govern when a material will undergo a phase transition? e.g., why is it exactly at the temperature T0 and pressure p0 that the substance X goes from one phase to the other?
Typically it would seem like the ΔT/ΔU is zero during phase change. Why is this? Is it consistent with the 2nd law? Somehow my intuition tells me that heating a substance should increase its temperature - but it has been a long time since I studied the actual thermodynamic equations.
And finally, and most important, do YOU know any good introductory texts in this topic that you woud recommend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
Which kinds of dynamics govern when a material will undergo a phase transition? e.g., why is it exactly at the temperature T0 and pressure p0 that the substance X goes from one phase to the other?
In general, a phase transition happens when the pressure, temperature and chemical potential of the two phases are equal. The difference of the chemical potentials is the free enthalpy ##\Delta G=\mu_2-\mu_1##, which is itself a function of T and P. So if we take the equality of T and P for granted, The equation ##\Delta G(T,P)=0## selects the line of phase equilibrium.
A simple example, where ##\Delta G## can be worked out analytically is the van der Waals gas.
There are also models of phase transitions in spin lattice models which can partly be treated analytically.
 
I don't understand. I don't know much about phases but how can we speak of T,p and μ of one phase and that these parameters should in general be different for those of another phase?
All we have is a thermodynamical system, the laws of thermodynamics do not say that we have different phases of a system?
I hope you follow, or can at least understand why I am confused.
 
Let me maybe try and explain what it is I don't understand about phase transitions.
The problem is that I don't understand why we have this "discontinous" behaviour of the physical system. Why is it that at one temperature, the system suddenly "decides" to let all energy be directed into changing its physical properties drastically, rather than this being a process that happened continously as we increased temperature. I just seems weird to me that there actually exists one temperature that separates 2 systems with very different physical properties.
 
Well, this is a very difficult question.
This sudden change happens only in macroscopic (="infinitely" large) systems. For microscopic systems, all phase transitions are smooth. Depending on the system, phase transitions also require a minimal number of dimensions.
The theory is simpler for second order phase transitions, e.g. for the ferromagnetic-paramagnetic transition.
Relatively easy to understand is the Landau theory of phase transitions. Basically, the free energy of the material is a 4th order polynomial. Below the transition temperature, it only has one minimum, above, it has two stable minima and the original minimum becomes a maximum. E.g. if the low temperature minimum corresponds to vanishing magnetization, above the transition temperatures, two stable minima exist with finite (and opposite) magnetization.
It is quite clear that this "deformation" of the function graph is perfectly continuous. Nevertheless, the magnetization has a discontinuous derivative wrt temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
14K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
763
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K