Dynamics question: work and energy (spring problem)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving a mass sliding on a frictionless wire and an ideal spring. Participants are attempting to calculate the minimum distance required for the mass to reach a specific point after being released from rest. The conversation includes various approaches to solving the problem, including energy considerations and geometric relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their solution and seeks validation from others.
  • Another participant suggests using trigonometric functions to relate the components of the problem, although the original poster notes the absence of an angle.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of identifying the critical point where the slider's kinetic energy is zero and questions the assumptions about potential energy at that point.
  • There is a discussion about the correct height to use in calculations, with one participant suggesting that the height should be the vertical distance from point A to point B.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that the velocity at point B is zero, arguing that the slider must have some velocity just before reaching point B due to energy considerations.
  • One participant proposes that the height used in calculations should be the highest point the slider reaches, indicating confusion about reference points and energy states.
  • A later reply illustrates an experimental analogy to clarify how varying the energy imparted to the slider affects its ability to reach point B.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit uncertainty and disagreement regarding the correct approach to the problem, particularly concerning energy states, reference points, and the implications of kinetic energy at various points in the motion. No consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the assumptions made about potential and kinetic energy, as well as the geometric relationships involved in the problem. There are unresolved questions about the correct height to use and the implications of energy conservation in this context.

Superhawkkodaka
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i just want everybody to check if my solution is correct.. because I am not confident with this one..
your help would be highly appreciated

Question: The 0.31kg mass slides on a frictionless wire that lies in the vertical plane. The ideal spring attached to the mass has a free length of 80mm and its stiffness is 120n/m. Calculate the smallest value of the distance b if the mass is to reach the end of the wire at B after being released from rest at A.

picture of the problem:
Untitled.png

The attempt at a solution..
so far this is what I've done:
20150314_201335.jpg
i think this equation of mine is wrong? or my assumptions are wrong.. since i can't solve (Sa) value using pythagorean theorem..

i don't know just my gut.. i badly need your advice guys...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you just relate it through a trig function?
 
PS. i
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Can't you just relate it through a trig function?
you mean for my (Sa)? there's no angle given..
 
  1. The idea is correct, but the details are wrong.

Think about these points:

If the slider is to reach the point B, what is the critical point that it must reach? At this point, the slider's kinetic energy is zero, the energy stored in the spring is also zero. What is the energy at this point? (The height you use is incorrect.)

At the very beginning, all of the energy of the system is in the form of the potential energy stored in the spring. The resting length of the spring is 80 mm, so you need to know how much beyond 80 mm the spring has been stretched. Prof. Pythagoras can tell you how long the spring is when the slider is at B.
 
i think i got the value for Sa
Untitled2.png


correct me if I am wrong.. i thought h is the vertical distance from pt A to B from my understanding from PE=mgh
Untitled.png

also.. critical point? I am lost i can't imagine.. why do i need to take account critical point?

all i know is that when the slider reaches point B the velocity is zero thus potential energy at B is zero since it will stop..
 
Superhawkkodaka said:
also.. critical point? I am lost i can't imagine.. why do i need to take account critical point?

all i know is that when the slider reaches point B the velocity is zero thus potential energy at B is zero since it will stop..
No, that's not right. The slider will have some velocity in the instant before it impacts the stop at point B. Why might that be? (where does the energy come from to give it this velocity?)
 
gneill said:
No, that's not right. The slider will have some velocity in the instant before it impacts the stop at point B. Why might that be? (where does the energy come from to give it this velocity?)

no velocity is given.. i think sir Quantum Defect suggestion is correct.. i already got the value Sa to solve for uknown b.. just that i think my assumed height (h = 0.08) from point A to B is wrong..

i don't know how to interpret what he said..
i'll just sir Quantum Defect quote :

Think about these points:

If the slider is to reach the point B, what is the critical point that it must reach? At this point, the slider's kinetic energy is zero, the energy stored in the spring is also zero. What is the energy at this point? (The height you use is incorrect.)

At the very beginning, all of the energy of the system is in the form of the potential energy stored in the spring. The resting length of the spring is 80 mm, so you need to know how much beyond 80 mm the spring has been stretched. Prof. Pythagoras can tell you how long the spring is when the slider is at B.
 
Superhawkkodaka said:
no velocity is given.. i think sir Quantum Defect suggestion is correct.. i already got the value Sa to solve for uknown b.. just that i think my assumed height (h = 0.08) from point A to B is wrong..

i don't know how to interpret what he said..
i'll just sir Quantum Defect quote :

Think about these points:

If the slider is to reach the point B, what is the critical point that it must reach? At this point, the slider's kinetic energy is zero, the energy stored in the spring is also zero. What is the energy at this point? (The height you use is incorrect.)

At the very beginning, all of the energy of the system is in the form of the potential energy stored in the spring. The resting length of the spring is 80 mm, so you need to know how much beyond 80 mm the spring has been stretched. Prof. Pythagoras can tell you how long the spring is when the slider is at B.
To get to B, the mass must reach the top of the loop, no?
 
Suppose you calculate the energy for the slider to reach the height at point B. How would ever reach point B? How could it pass point B' which I've marked on the figure:
Fig1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters and Quantum Defect
  • #10
Quantum Defect said:
To get to B, the mass must reach the top of the loop, no?

so the height (h) i must use is the highest point the slider have made for it(slider) to reach point B

so my height h=2(0.08)= 0.16... now i seem to be getting same answer given to us 0.15m..
Untitled.png


ok I am just confused.. i know that the slider will reach highest point let's say "h"
why did you use the point h as reference? also why is kinetic energy zero at the highest point.. isn't that only applicable to projectile motion/free falling body problems?

isn't it point B should be your reference since it was asked for slider to reach point B? I actually used point B as my reference and assumed it's velocity is zero?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Superhawkkodaka said:
so the height (h) i must use is the highest point the slider have made for it(slider) to reach point B

so my height h=2(0.08)= 0.16... now i seem to be getting same answer given to us 0.15m..
Untitled.png


ok I am just confused.. i know that the slider would reach highest point let's say "h"
why did you use the point "h" as reference? shouldn't it be at point B..

also why is kinetic energy zero at the highest point.. isn't that only applicable to projectile motion/free falling body problems? does it also apply to spring problems.. if that's the case.. if the slider reaches at "h" then it will continue to travel at point B in a free fall manner?...
 
  • #12

The trick is to think about the actual slider. This is very much like a pinball game. You can adjust how much energy goes into the slider by stretching the spring. As the problem statement says, your goal is to find the minimume stretch (minimum energy imparted to the slider) to get the slider to B.

Imagine that you do this experimentally. You pull the slider out just a bit. The slider takes off and starts to go up the slope, but doesn't have enough energy to get to the top. You decide that you need to give the slider a bit more energy and pull the slider back a long way. The slider whips out and whirls around the loop at top speed, nearly breaking things when it hits the stop at point B. OK. You look around to make sure nobody saw you almost break the contraption. You try again with the slider pulled out between the first and second tries. On this try, the slider goes up nicely, and almost makes it over the top of the loop, and slides back down to the start. You tell yourself that you are very close. The slider needs just a tiny bit of energy more to get over the top and get to B. You pull the spring back just a bit more, and the slider goes up the loop, and at the top, the slider looks like it may be stuck, but just when you are going to push the slider back to the start, the slider starts sliding back to the left, and falls down to B.
You did it!

How did you do this? You launched it so that it had just enough energy to get to the top of the loop, with an infinitessimal amount of energy added to this to keep it moving at the very top. If you put in less energy, it will slide back to the start. If you put in too much energy, it will still have significnat kinetic energy at the top, as it whips around the loop.

Make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Superhawkkodaka and CWatters
  • #13
Quantum Defect said:
The trick is to think about the actual slider. This is very much like a pinball game. You can adjust how much energy goes into the slider by stretching the spring. As the problem statement says, your goal is to find the minimume stretch (minimum energy imparted to the slider) to get the slider to B.

Imagine that you do this experimentally. You pull the slider out just a bit. The slider takes off and starts to go up the slope, but doesn't have enough energy to get to the top. You decide that you need to give the slider a bit more energy and pull the slider back a long way. The slider whips out and whirls around the loop at top speed, nearly breaking things when it hits the stop at point B. OK. You look around to make sure nobody saw you almost break the contraption. You try again with the slider pulled out between the first and second tries. On this try, the slider goes up nicely, and almost makes it over the top of the loop, and slides back down to the start. You tell yourself that you are very close. The slider needs just a tiny bit of energy more to get over the top and get to B. You pull the spring back just a bit more, and the slider goes up the loop, and at the top, the slider looks like it may be stuck, but just when you are going to push the slider back to the start, the slider starts sliding back to the left, and falls down to B.
You did it!

thanks dude!. took me long enough to realize. it's just me being slow learner.. hehe.. thanks to all who helped me guys..
How did you do this? You launched it so that it had just enough energy to get to the top of the loop, with an infinitessimal amount of energy added to this to keep it moving at the very top. If you put in less energy, it will slide back to the start. If you put in too much energy, it will still have significnat kinetic energy at the top, as it whips around the loop.

Make sense?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K