E-field due to a large circular plane of uniform distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E-field) created by a uniformly charged circular disc at a point located x meters away from its center. Participants clarify that the correct approach involves integrating to find the E-field at that point, rather than using solid angles, which is less common for this problem. There is also a correction regarding terminology, emphasizing the need to calculate the force on a charge rather than the field itself. Suggestions are made to first work through the integration method before exploring alternative approaches. The conversation encourages sharing solutions if the solid angle method is attempted.
iontail
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
E-field due to a large circular plane of uniform distribution!

Hi Imagine i have a circular disc of radius R with uniform charge density, and a small charge x meters away from its center. The idea is to calculate the e field for this charged disc on the small charge. I can solve this problem if i solve the problem by integrating with respect to r. But i was told this can also be done by using solid angles. Would some one please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, what do you mean by solid angles? If you know the potential, you can get to the E-field.

Integrating is really the way to do it, and whatever way works for you (apparently integration) is a good way.
 
iontail said:
Hi Imagine i have a circular disc of radius R with uniform charge density, and a small charge x meters away from its center. The idea is to calculate the e field for this charged disc on the small charge. I can solve this problem if i solve the problem by integrating with respect to r. But i was told this can also be done by using solid angles. Would some one please help me?

First of all, you mean the force on the charge (and not the field on the charge, which does not make sense). So you need to figure out the field at the location of the point charge and then multiply it by the magnitude of the charge to get the force.

Secondly, forget about the alternate method first and try to work out the field due to a circular disc of radius R at a point on the axis distant x units from the center. Can you do this?

(Do you have ideas for the solid angle method? If so, try it and post your solution here...)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top