Calculating E Field Magnitude: Contributions from + and - Charges 5cm Above Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter sasuke07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Magnitude
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E field) magnitude at the origin due to both positive and negative charges located 5 cm above the horizontal axis. The key equation used is kQ/d², where k is the Coulomb's constant (9 x 10⁹ N m²/C²) and d is the distance (0.05 m). Participants clarified that both charges contribute equally to the E field magnitude, and the components must be calculated using trigonometric functions (sine and cosine) based on the angle of the field lines. The final calculated E field was 7.6 x 10⁴ N/C, but the expected answer was 7.1 x 10⁴ N/C, prompting further discussion on potential discrepancies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric field calculations
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Basic grasp of charge interactions (positive and negative)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric field equations using Coulomb's Law
  • Study vector addition of forces and fields in physics
  • Learn about the significance of angles in electric field calculations
  • Explore common errors in electric field magnitude calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand electric field calculations involving multiple charges.

sasuke07
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the magnitude of the collective contribution to the E field at the origin from both the + and - charges located 5 cm above the horizontal axis?

Homework Equations


kQ/d^2



The Attempt at a Solution


Im just having a problem setting up this problem. Could someone help me on getting started
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
hi sasuke07! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

first, find the magnitude of each contribution,

from that, find the x and y components …

what do you get? :smile:
 
I already figured out the magnitued of the the positive charge 5 cm above the axis and got 5.4X10^4. What do you mean by the x and y components. WOuldn't the negative charge have the same magnitude of the positive charge.
 
sasuke07 said:
WOuldn't the negative charge have the same magnitude of the positive charge.

yes :smile:
What do you mean by the x and y components.

draw an arrow at the origin showing the direction of the field from the positive charge

then find the x and y components of that arrow

(and finally you'll add them to the x and y components of the arrow from the negative charge :wink:)
 
so to figure out the x component wouldn't it be Kq/d^2 where k=9X10^9, q is 30X10^9= charge and d would be .05m^2. Or would i have to use cosine and sine to figure out the x and y components and if so could you show me how to set it up.
 
no, you must use cos and sin, of the angle the arrow makes
 
so would it be Kq/r^2sintheta
and Kq/r^2Costheta. Where theta would be 90 degrees?
 
or would theta be 45
 
θ is the angle of the line from the charge to the origin
 
  • #10
awesome so 45 degrees.
 
  • #11
So were the equations correct though?
 
  • #12
looks ok :smile:

so what is the total field from both the positive and the negative charge?​
 
  • #13
i got 7.6X10^4 by doing KQ/r^2sin45 and the answer is the same for cos45. BUt i checked the answer and its supposed to be 7.1X10^4. Any suggestions
 
  • #14
sasuke07 said:
i got 7.6X10^4 by doing KQ/r^2sin45 and the answer is the same for cos45. BUt i checked the answer and its supposed to be 7.1X10^4. Any suggestions

your answer looks right to me :confused:

(are you sure it's 5 cm that they're asking about?)
 
  • #15
i think its 5cm because the length of the x and y components is 5cm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K