[E&M] Concentrical metalic spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xsnac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Spheres
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conditions for potential energy and electric charge in two concentric metallic spheres. For scenario (a), charging the outer sphere results in a potential energy of zero while maintaining a non-zero electric charge. In scenario (b), charging the inner sphere leads to a non-zero potential energy on the outer sphere, while the inner sphere can have zero charge. Participants clarify the distinction between electric potential and electric potential energy, emphasizing the correct application of relevant equations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and contexts of these equations in electrostatics.
Xsnac
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement

I two concentric metalical spheres r1 =/= r2.
What to do to have:
a) potential energy = 0 and electric charge =/= 0
b) potential energy =/= 0 and electric charge =0.

In eighter one of the spheres.

Relevant equations
Gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
If I charge the outside sphere, I will have potential energy = 0 on it and electric charge =/= 0.

b)
I tought If I charge the one inside with Q, I will have a potential =/= 0 on the bigger sphere and 0 charge.

Is this correct? The problem does not give correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do any of the spheres have an initial charge on them? And are you at a point in between the two spheres?
 
I'm outside and I can charge eighter the bigger or the smaller or both of them. I have to have the specs from eighter a) or b) on 1 of them.
 
Well, when you have a net positive or negative charge the potential will approach zero only at infinity (unless otherwise specified such as the ground on a circuit). If you charge the outside sphere, why would potential energy be zero on it? May you show us what equation you are using for electric potential energy?
 
Last edited:
Xsnac said:
Homework Statement

I two concentric metallic spheres r1 =/= r2.
What to do to have:
a) potential energy = 0 and electric charge =/= 0
b) potential energy =/= 0 and electric charge =0.

In either one of the spheres.

Relevant equations
Gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
If I charge the outside sphere, I will have potential energy = 0 on it and electric charge =/= 0.

b)
I thought If I charge the one inside with Q, I will have a potential =/= 0 on the bigger sphere and 0 charge.

Is this correct? The problem does not give correct answer.
Electric potential

or

Potential energy stored in the system?
 
SammyS said:
Electric potential

or

Potential energy stored in the system?
Electric potential
 
Xsnac said:
Electric potential
That makes more sense. Electric potential is different from electrical potential energy.
So, what equation do you have for finding the electric potential at a given distance from a uniformly charged sphere?
 
haruspex said:
That makes more sense. Electric potential is different from electrical potential energy.
So, what equation do you have for finding the electric potential at a given distance from a uniformly charged sphere?
k * q1 / r ( where K is 1/4 pi epsilon )
 
Xsnac said:
k * q1 / r ( where K is 1/4 pi epsilon )
What does "r" represent ?
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
What does "r" represent ?
the distance from where the electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential.
 
  • #11
Xsnac said:
the distance from where the electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential.
No. Check your course notes.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
No. Check your course notes.
that's what I have written in the manual. Electric potential V = Q/(4*pi*epsilon) * 1/r. Should I upload a picture of the manual?
 
  • #13
Xsnac said:
that's what I have written in the manual. Electric potential V = Q/(4*pi*epsilon) * 1/r. Should I upload a picture of the manual?
I'm not querying your equation. It's your definition of r that is wrong.
 
  • #14
then I'm lost. what's the definition? I always tought it is the distance between the place where electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential..
 
  • #15
Xsnac said:
then I'm lost. what's the definition? I always tought it is the distance between the place where electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential..
The equation you quoted can be applied in two contexts.
In the most basic one it gives the potential at distance r caused by a point charge Q, if taking the potential at infinity to be zero.
It also works if the charge is spread uniformly over a spherical shell or through a solid sphere. In these cases, r is the distance from the centre of the sphere, and the equation only works if r is greater than the radius of the sphere.
 
Back
Top