E on q independent of v - confusing?

jason12345
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Many textbooks make the statement that it's found experimentally that the electric force by a stationary charge on on a moving charge is independent of its velocity.

Has this lead to any confusion for people here?

Embarrassingly, I was using this to mean that in the proper frame of the moving charge, it experiences the same force E independent of its velocity. :eek:

Now I realize it simply means that:

F = d/dt (gamma m v) = qE

Of all the concepts in basic relativity I've had problems with, force stands out for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the frame of the moving charge there will be a magnetic field, and that depends on the velocity. The lab frame makes calculations easier in this case.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top