MHB Are π^(e) and e^(π) irrational with decimal approximations of 21.7 and 21.2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the irrationality of π^(e) and e^(π), with e^(π) confirmed as transcendental and thus irrational based on the Gelfond-Schneider theorem. While Wolfram does not provide information on π^(e), the ability to perform arithmetic operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division on these expressions remains valid regardless of their approximations. The approximate values of e^(π) at 21.7 and π^(e) at 21.2 are noted, but these approximations do not determine their rationality. The distinction between approximate values and actual properties of the numbers is emphasized, highlighting that approximation does not affect the classification of a number as rational or irrational. Therefore, the discussion concludes that while e^(π) is irrational, the status of π^(e) remains uncertain.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Can we say that π^(e) and e^(π) are irrational? If so, why?

Can we add, subtract, divide and multiply π^(e) and e^(π)
if π is approximately 3.1 and e is approximately 2.7?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Can we say that π^(e) and e^(π) are irrational? If so, why?

Can we add, subtract, divide and multiply π^(e) and e^(π)
if π is approximately 3.1 and e is approximately 2.7?

Let's see what wolfram says...

Wolfram doesn't say anything about pi^e, so for now that's unknown.
But it says that e^pi is transcendental (implying it's irrational). And indeed that follows from the Gelfond-Schneider theorem.

We can for sure add, subtract, divide, and multiply pi^e and e^pi - whether we approximate them with rational numbers or not.
 
Since $$\pi$$ is approximately 3.1 and e is approximately 2.7, [math]e^{/pi}[/math] is approximately 2.7^{3.1}= 21.7 and \pi^e is approximately 3.1^{2.7}= 21.2. But the word "approximately" is important there! An approximate value tells us nothing about whether a number is rational or irrational.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Back
Top