E to an imaginary power, equivalent expressions, inequal outcomes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of exponentiation involving complex numbers, specifically the expression e^(ix) = cos(x) + i sin(x). The original poster questions the validity of several equivalent expressions involving exponents, suggesting they should hold for all values of a, b, c, and d. However, responses clarify that these equivalences are only true for positive real numbers and do not hold for complex numbers, providing a counterexample to illustrate the point. The confusion arises from the differences in behavior between real and complex exponentiation. The conversation concludes with the original poster expressing gratitude for the clarification.
daniel.e2718
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm completely stumped. So is my high-school calculus teacher, but he hasn't done imaginary powers for forty-five years. Hopefully somebody can explain this...

To clarify, I understand the reasoning between the following equation:

e^{i x}=cos(x)+i sin(x)

Now, I need to put some things on the table

First, do you agree that the following is true:

a^{b c d}=(a^{b c})^d=(a^{b d})^c=(a^{c d})^b=(a^b)^{c d}=(a^c)^{b d}=(a^d)^{b c}

for all values of a, b, c, and d where the original expression is defined?

If not, tell me why...

If yes, let's continue.

I will now define a, b, c, and d.

a=e,b=\pi,c=i,d=\frac{1}{3}

Now, we'll go through some of the above equal expressions

a^{b c d}=e^{\frac{\pi}{3} i}=cos(\frac{\pi}{3})+i sin(\frac{\pi}{3})=\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}=\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}

(a^{b c})^d=(e^{\pi i})^{\frac{1}{3}}=(cos(\pi)+i sin(\pi))^{\frac{1}{3}}=((-1)+i*(0))^{\frac{1}{3}}=(-1)^{\frac{1}{3}}=-1

(a^{b d})^c=(e^{\frac{\pi}{3}})^i=(2.849653908\ldots)^i=\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}

(a^{c d})^b=(e^{\frac{i}{3}})^\pi=(cos(\frac{1}{3})+i sin(\frac{1}{3}))^\pi=(0.944956946\ldots+0.327194697\ldots i)^\pi=\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}

I won't do any of the form (a^x)^(y z), because my problem is already present...

If the first expressions I mentioned are indeed equivalent, then why is the second one that I evaluated negative one?

It is completely confusing.

Oh, and hello to the forum for the first time :P
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daniel.e2718 said:
First, do you agree that the following is true:

a^{b c d}=(a^{b c})^d=(a^{b d})^c=(a^{c d})^b=(a^b)^{c d}=(a^c)^{b d}=(a^d)^{b c}

No it's not. It is true for positive reals, but just because it is true for that doesn't mean it is true for all complex numbers.
It's easy to show that it fails because we have a counterexample: for an integer n
e^{1+2ni\pi} = e
(e^{1+2ni\pi})^{1+2ni\pi} = e
Multiply the exponents out and divide by e
e^{-4\pi^2 n^2} = 1
which is nonsense. I've left out some steps so its a good exercise to put them back in.
 
pwsnafu said:
No it's not. It is true for positive reals, but just because it is true for that doesn't mean it is true for all complex numbers.

Okay, that's what I was looking for. The last time I did anything with proofs was two years ago in 10th grade geometry, and it mostly fill-in-the-blank. Thanks though!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top