Earth Spin and Rotation: Effects of Fast and Heavy Objects

AI Thread Summary
A fast-moving, heavy object can indeed alter the Earth's spin and rotation, with significant events like large earthquakes demonstrating this effect. Spin refers to the Earth's rotation around its axis, while rotation pertains to its revolution around the Sun. A hypothetical scenario where a heavy object strikes Earth tangentially could impact its spin. The discussion also humorously notes that if all of China were to run in a specific direction, it could theoretically influence Earth's spin, though the practicality of such a scenario is questioned. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the potential for external forces to affect Earth's rotational dynamics.
gianeshwar
Messages
225
Reaction score
14
If a fast moving and heavy object strikes earth,can it change its spin or rotation or both?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the distinction between spin and rotation in this context?

Pending that clarification, the short answer to your question is "yes".
 
Thanks for reply.
By spin I meant about Earth axis and by rotation I meant rotation(revolution) of Earth about Sun.
For change in spin,I further specify that if the high speed heavy object pushes Earth almost tangentially(not just grazing)
 
If all of China started running east at the same time, that would do it.
 
Thanks for reply.
By spin I meant about Earth axis and by rotation I meant rotation(revolution) of Earth about Sun.
For change in spin,I further specify that if the high speed heavy object pushes Earth almost tangentially(not just grazing)
OK then, we have given you the correct answers in posts #2 and #3. Enjoy.
If all of China started running east at the same time, that would do it.
Isn't all of China already East? They'd have to run west...
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top