Earthing Transformer: Wye vs Zigzag Connection

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of Wye versus Zigzag connections in earthing transformers. Zigzag transformers are preferred for earthing due to their cost-effectiveness, especially in medium voltage applications, as they provide grounding without the need for multiple star-connected transformers. The choice between these configurations depends on the system's design and grounding requirements, with Zigzag transformers being particularly beneficial in scenarios involving ungrounded buses. Additionally, while Zigzag is a common method, earthing transformers can also utilize standard star-delta configurations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of earthing transformer configurations, specifically Wye and Zigzag.
  • Knowledge of medium voltage (MV) electrical systems.
  • Familiarity with grounding techniques in three-phase systems.
  • Awareness of cost considerations in transformer installations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and application of Zigzag transformers in earthing systems.
  • Learn about the advantages and disadvantages of Wye and Delta configurations in transformers.
  • Explore grounding techniques for ungrounded bus systems in medium voltage applications.
  • Investigate cost analysis methods for transformer installations and their impact on system design.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, power system designers, and professionals involved in the installation and maintenance of earthing transformers will benefit from this discussion.

jacquisdelumen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
:rolleyes: I'm curious if we use a direct wye connection instead of zigzag in case of earthing transformer.. i know that by merely looking if we use wye connection in earthing specially in medium voltage you have to have enough reactance for your exciting voltage.which will cost more in construction.also should there be shorts you directly ground the system which is very dangerous.does my opinion correct? any opinion might help..thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am thoroughly confused by the above.
 
jacquisdelumen said:
:rolleyes: I'm curious if we use a direct wye connection instead of zigzag in case of earthing transformer.. i know that by merely looking if we use wye connection in earthing specially in medium voltage you have to have enough reactance for your exciting voltage.which will cost more in construction.also should there be shorts you directly ground the system which is very dangerous.does my opinion correct? any opinion might help..thanks

If you are describing a three phase transformer, we in the USA usually refer to them as a WYE or Delta configuration. I’m not familiar with “zigzag”. Your post is hard to understand.
 
Folks,

Zigzag transformers are used all over the world for earthing (grounding) and unearthed bus, and in voltage ranges from LV to MV. I think the original question is along the lines "why would you bother earthing a bus with a separate zigzag when star-points (wye-point) are available?" I think it mainly comes down to cost - if there is a need to Earth a bus via several separate star-connected transformers, each with associated neutral bushing and full voltage insulation at the netra end, the lower cost with a single zigzag transformer comes into consideration. I have seen them on a set of 33 kV busses where one of the incomers was delta, so there was a possibility of an ungrounded bus if that incomer was in service with all other star-connected feeders and incomers out of service - a dedicated earthing transformer then makes sense and zigzag construction is a very cost-effective way of achieving that. If all incomers on a bus were star connected and are able to be earthed at tehe star-point, then there is no need for a separate earthing transformer.

Earthing transformers do not have to be zigzag - it is just one method - they can also be a more normal star delta with the star-point earthed and the delta either used for aux power or not used.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K