Earth's Magnetic Poles: Why Do They Not Correspond?

AI Thread Summary
Earth's magnetic poles do not align with its rotation axis due to the distinct nature of the geomagnetic dynamo, which generates the magnetic field. The rotation of Earth and its magnetic field are separate phenomena, influenced by different mechanisms. The geographic and magnetic poles differ in location, highlighting the complexity of Earth's magnetic field. Understanding the geomagnetic dynamo can clarify why the magnetic field behaves as it does, despite the lack of a solid, uniformly charged core. The discussion emphasizes the importance of researching these concepts for a deeper understanding of Earth's magnetic properties.
MartinV05
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Why are Earth's magnetic poles not corresponding with the rotation axis? And the spin direction is opposite of the right hand rule. Probably the actual spin and the magnetic influence have something in common, but can someone tell me what's happening in this spinning process? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are Earth's magnetic poles not corresponding with the rotation axis?
Why should they? They are different phenomena.

To see how the Earth has a magnetic field at all, look up "geomagnetic dynamo".
 
Simon Bridge said:
Why should they? They are different phenomena.

To see how the Earth has a magnetic field at all, look up "geomagnetic dynamo".

and also whilst you are doing that, note the difference in the locations of the north and south magnetic poles compared to the geographic north and south poles :)

cheers
Dave
 
I know that the geographic poles and the magnetic ones are not the same, but it somehow seemed possible to me that the rotation is dependent of the magnetic field (or the other way around).
 
MartinV05 said:
I know that the geographic poles and the magnetic ones are not the same, but it somehow seemed possible to me that the rotation is dependent of the magnetic field (or the other way around).

Why not look up Geomagnetic Dynamo as suggested?
 
A solid rotating sphere with a net charge has a magnetic field that lines up with the rotation axis.
The Earth is not solid all the way through and does not carry much of a net charge to speak of - so we would not expect the same mechanisms to produce the Earth's magnetic field.

Actually, it's a better question to ask why the magnetic field lines up with the rotation poles as well as they do.
The "geomagnetic dynamo" stuff explains this. I could just summarize it for you here - but that's a lot of typing I don't need to do.

You may like to also look up the "Mars magnetic field".
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top