Earth's Surface Area that reflects light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Earth's surface area that reflects light and the area that radiates. The textbook states that only one quarter of the Earth's surface reflects light, which is derived from the effective illuminated area being πr², the cross-section seen by the Sun, rather than half of the surface area. This is because the geometry of light reflection considers the orientation of the surface to the incoming light, leading to the conclusion that the effective reflecting area is equivalent to that of a flat disc, not a hemisphere. Participants clarify that while half of the Earth is illuminated at any time, the actual area reflecting light is smaller due to the nature of light projection and optics. The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of understanding these geometric principles in optics.
dsfranca
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I was reading about the relationship between the surface area of Earth that reflects light and the one that radiates. As the whole Earth emits radiation, the area that would radiate is A=4\Pir2, where r is the radius of earth. But the weird part is that the textbook says that only one quarter (\Pir) of the Earth's surface reflects light. Why isn't it half of the surface? Afterall half of the surface is illuminated by day!
Am I missing something or is the textbook wrong, as he uses this information many times!
Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
The effective surface of the Earth that is being illuminated by sunlight at any given time is only pi r2 (the cross section seen by the Sun), not 2 pi r2 (half of 4 pi r2).
 
Thanks for the answer, but I still did not understand why the effective surface is only one quarter of the Earth's surface. Could you go into more detail please?
Thanks
 
I agree w/ Bob S, the book probably means that the *projected* area of a hemisphere exposed to a plane wave is pi*r^2 (i.e. a circle of radius 'r'). You have to take into account the orientation of the surface with respect to the incident wavefront.

Perhaps it makes more sense geometrically- when you are looking at the (full) moon you do not perceive it to be a hemispherical object, it appears to be a circle.

And, the area of a circle is 1/4 the area of a sphere.
 
Yes, I see what you mean, but wouldn't 2$2\pi r^{2}$ be a better approximation
in this case? Afterall, I am trying to determine the area of the earth's
surface that is reflecting light, and by common knowledge, one would
say that half of the Earth is always illuminated (half of the earth
is having a day while the other a night). Where is the flaw in this
argument and why is this not a better approximation?
 
Hi dsfranca! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Suppose the Earth was a spherical mirror …

then it would reflect all the light falling on it …

but that would be the same amount of light as if the Earth was replaced by a flat disc of the same diameter …

so the "effective surface" is the area of that disc, which is πr2, or AEarth/4. :wink:
 
Hum! Everything makes sense now, how could I not have considered optics when talking about reflection! Thank you for the explanation tiny-tim!
 
Back
Top