Eddy Current Speedometer Experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on an experiment designed to measure angular velocity using eddy currents generated by a motor-driven shaft. Participants utilized 8mm shafts, pillow bearings, and ceramic magnets, but reported no detectable torque on non-ferrous metals like aluminum. Key factors affecting performance include the strength and orientation of the magnets, the gap between the magnets and the aluminum disc, and the overall design of the magnetic circuit. Recommendations include using a single bar magnet for optimal results and ensuring a minimal gap for effective eddy current generation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eddy current principles
  • Familiarity with magnetic circuits and their components
  • Knowledge of angular velocity measurement techniques
  • Experience with basic experimental setup and design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "eddy current experiments" for design inspiration and troubleshooting
  • Explore the effects of magnet orientation and strength on eddy current generation
  • Investigate the use of a single bar magnet in eddy current applications
  • Learn about optimizing the magnetic circuit for improved performance
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, hobbyists, and educators interested in experimental physics, particularly those focusing on eddy current applications and angular velocity measurement techniques.

Thomas Rugh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Trying to create an experiment that utilizes a motor driven shaft to measure the angular velocity of another shaft via eddy currents. We made a mock experiment that uses 8mm shafts, pillow bearings, and ceramic magnets from home depot, but don't see a torque on a non-ferrous metal attached to a staff.

We tried using aluminum cans, copper coils wrapped around the diameter, and are about to try aluminum plating. The ceramic magnets have their poles orientated as seen in the diagram. The motor spins at 550 rpm, but we can't see the slightest torque being produced nor feel anything if we hold it by hand.

Do we need thicker sheet metal, stronger magnets, geometry, and/or have the magnets closer? Are we overestimating the force that can be generated? Thanks in advanced.

image.jpeg
SLDWORKS_2018-05-19_16-15-18.png
1583.jpg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    25.9 KB · Views: 1,045
  • SLDWORKS_2018-05-19_16-15-18.png
    SLDWORKS_2018-05-19_16-15-18.png
    48.3 KB · Views: 1,021
  • 1583.jpg
    1583.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 1,288
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to PF. I have never tried to make one of these but I have (distant past) taken a car speedo apart so I recognise the parts.
It is easy to underestimate the design effort in an everyday bit of old technology and there are some important features required for the system to work. You need a good magnetic circuit, involving the bar magnet and a steel cup (for a 'return path') with a small gap in which the aluminium cup can rotate. It is the field, sweeping across the thickness of the aluminium cup that generates the eddy currents.
You don't show a diagram of your actual setup so I am assuming that this is what could be wrong. You mention magnets (plural). The classic arrangement is a single bar magnet so what is your design? Do you have your ceramic magnets orientated the right way and do you have a very small gap between magnet and aluminium disc?
The eddy current effect with powerful modern magnets is usually very easily demonstrated. If you drop a magnet down through a copper tube, the eddy currents will produce a definite braking effect - so the force is significant. (If the tube has an insulating slot running down it, there is no braking effect.
I suggest you Google around for "eddy current experiments" and that should give you some ideas.
Edit: PS I googled around and, of course, modern super magnets are strong enough to show eddy current effects all over the place. Much more than the magnets I played with as a boy,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K