Effect of Immersed Iron Piece on Spring Balance Reading | Physics Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter rishch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
When an iron piece is immersed in a bucket of water while suspended by a separate string, the reading on the spring balance will increase due to the buoyant force acting on the iron piece. This buoyant force results in an equal and opposite downward force on the water, thus affecting the balance reading. The discussion raises questions about whether an object can exert a reaction force while stationary, clarifying that reaction forces occur between two interacting bodies. It is emphasized that the water responds to the iron piece's displacement, regardless of the string's presence. Overall, the interaction of forces in this scenario illustrates fundamental principles of physics.
rishch
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Q. A spring balance read 10 kg when a bucket of water is suspended from it. An iron piece having some mass is suspended by another string and is then immersed in the bucket with half of its volume. The reading of the spring balance will -

(A)decrease
(B)increase
(C)remain the same
(D)another spring balance needed

My answer to this question would be (C) as the iron piece is suspended by another string so it does not apply any force on the spring balance. However, according to the answer book the correct answer is (B) and the reason they give is this - The iron piece experiences buoyant force exerted by water. The iron piece will exert an equal and opposite downward force on water. So reading of balance will increase.

Is it possible for an object to exert a reaction force while it is stationary ? Wouldn't it exert a force on the string that its attached to instead of on the water ? Is that possible ? Could an object exert a reaction force on an object apart from the one which exerted the action force ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rishch! :smile:
rishch said:
Is it possible for an object to exert a reaction force while it is stationary ?

A reaction force usually is between stationary objects. :wink:
Wouldn't it exert a force on the string that its attached to instead of on the water ? Is that possible ?

it exerts (and receives) a force from both

remember, the water doesn't know the string is there :rolleyes:

it only knows that the iron is shoving its way in!
Could an object exert a reaction force on an object apart from the one which exerted the action force ?

no

reaction forces come in pairs, always between the same two bodies

any other pair of forces … even if they are equal and opposite … aren't a reaction pair
 
Thanks !
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top