I Effect of Nearby Mountain on an Ideal Pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the effect of a nearby mountain on an ideal pendulum due to a horizontal gravitational force component of 10^-5g. To analyze this, one approach is to determine an angle that modifies the gravitational acceleration to g(-1z + 10^-5x), centering around a symmetric axis. For a first-order approximation, the pendulum can be treated as a standard 1g pendulum with its center of swing displaced by 10^-5 times the length of the pendulum arm (A). This method allows for the incorporation of the perturbation while maintaining the integrity of the ideal pendulum model. The conversation highlights the mathematical transformations necessary to account for the mountain's influence on pendulum dynamics.
bob012345
Gold Member
Messages
2,283
Reaction score
1,010
Suppose there is a very large mountain adjacent to a pendulum such that there is a horizontal component gravitational force of ##10^{-5}g## acting on the otherwise ideal pendulum. How would one use a perturbation to add that effect to first order?

My initial thought would be to figure an angle that made the total gravitational acceleration ##g(-1z+10^{−5}x)## operating around a symmetric axis and which gives an ideal pendulum and then transform the coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are only looking for a 1st order approximation, treat it as a 1g pendulum with the center of the swing displaced 10^-5 A were A is the length of the pendulum arm.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and bob012345
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top