Effect of Shielding on Electron Penetration

  • Thread starter Thread starter garvit21794
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shielding
garvit21794
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
as i have understood, in a many electron atom the degeneracy is lost due to shielding effect. and from quantum mechanical model of one electron atom we can say that keeping principal quantum number(n) fixed, the radius at which radial probability function takes maximum value decreases with increasing angular quantum number(l). then why is it that the 's' shell in many electron atom penetrates more than a 'p' or a 'd' shell and it experiences greater effective nuclear charge.? according to me it should have been the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garvit21794 said:
as i have understood, in a many electron atom the degeneracy is lost due to shielding effect. and from quantum mechanical model of one electron atom we can say that keeping principal quantum number(n) fixed, the radius at which radial probability function takes maximum value decreases with increasing angular quantum number(l). then why is it that the 's' shell in many electron atom penetrates more than a 'p' or a 'd' shell and it experiences greater effective nuclear charge.? according to me it should have been the other way around.

The p and d shells have experience greater screening than the s shells as they don't penetrate so far in. As you say they have a greater average radius.
http://m.wikihow.com/Determine-Screening-Constant-and-Effective-Nuclear-Charge
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top