Effect of wire heating on battery EMF

AI Thread Summary
Wire heating increases resistance, affecting the electromotive force (EMF) readings of a battery. The discussion highlights that thicker wires can help reduce this heating effect due to their larger cross-sectional area, which lowers resistance. The practical experiment involved measuring voltage and current to plot a graph, with the y-intercept representing EMF. It was clarified that the primary concern regarding heating pertains to the internal resistance of the battery rather than the connecting wires or rheostat. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately determining the battery's EMF in experiments.
Molly1235
Messages
77
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



I need to know what effect wire heating would have on the reading of the EMF of a battery, and how the heating effect can be reduced!


Homework Equations



V= IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I know that the heating effect increases the resistance in the wire but this is as far as I've got...as far as minimising the effect would a thicker wire work? As according to the resistivity equation a greater area results in less resistance...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Difficult to help without some more information. What is the context of this question/problem/exercise ?
 
BvU said:
Difficult to help without some more information. What is the context of this question/problem/exercise ?


Ok, so we did a practical where we attached a rheostat to a cell, changing the resistance to get different values of I and V. We then plotted a graph of V (y axis) against I (x axis), the y intercept being E. I need to figure out the effect the additional resistance of the wire heating would have on the gradient of the line, thus the y intercept and value of E? I feel like I'm over complicating it but my head is super confused!
 
OK, so there are several wires involved: the connecting wires and the wire of the rheostat, to name a few.
I take it V and I were measured with meters, the V meter across the clamps of the battery and the I meter in series with the rheostat?
Did you get a straight line in the plot?
And: apparently there is an extra question about the effect of wires heating up. Which wires do you think are meant?
 
BvU said:
OK, so there are several wires involved: the connecting wires and the wire of the rheostat, to name a few.
I take it V and I were measured with meters, the V meter across the clamps of the battery and the I meter in series with the rheostat?
Did you get a straight line in the plot?
And: apparently there is an extra question about the effect of wires heating up. Which wires do you think are meant?


Yes the voltmeter was connected across the battery terminals and the ammeter in series. I got a straight line with a negative gradient...not sure which wires they're referring to as the question just asked me to talk about limitations and my teacher told us to talk about heating in wires. I'm assuming they mean the connecting wires though...
 
Well I know that the heating effect increases the resistance in the wire but this is as far as I've got...as far as minimising the effect would a thicker wire work? As according to the resistivity equation a greater area results in less resistance...?
Correct on three counts.
But if the voltmeter measures the voltage directly across the clamps of the battery, and the current meter at the same time measures the current actually delivered, the only wires that could disturb the situation would be wires inside the battery. The internal resistance, so to say. Which, along with the e.m.f. of the battery, is what your experiment is designed to determine.
From what you have described so far, you don't make use of the precise resistance of the rheostat, so it wouldn't matter if it heats up or not.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top