Effective approaches to physics education

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the critique of traditional physics textbooks, which are often perceived as overly mathematical and disconnected from real-world applications. A professor highlights that many physics problems, such as those involving electromagnetic fields, fail to provide students with a meaningful understanding of the concepts. Instead, he advocates for a hands-on approach in labs that emphasizes practical understanding of principles. Participants in the discussion seek recommendations for textbooks that prioritize conceptual learning over mathematical exercises, particularly for introductory physics. There is also acknowledgment that students often struggle with the mathematical complexities of quantum mechanics, leading to a lack of comprehension. The conversation suggests a need for educational resources that bridge the gap between theory and practical understanding, especially in challenging subjects like quantum physics.
physical_eric
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My professor and I were talking today and he was suggesting that most physics texts are laden with math that is sometime unrelated to the problems at hand. His specific example was a question that asked the student to find the electromagnetic field at x if the field increases by a given exponential function. He asserted that electromagnetic fields increase linearly or like a sin wave (I might not be quoting him completely correctly, but that isn't the point), and that this problem doesn't give the student a real understanding of the phenomenon.
The lab I have with him is a lot of hands on with the student figuring out how the principles work and using them to find out what they need to know.

Are there any good textbooks that provide more than mathematical exercises and walk the student through a process that will end with a familiar and useful understanding of the material?
We are mostly talking about introductory physics, what are some alternative approaches that have been effective?

I have also heard many students argue that they get bogged down in the mathematical arguments of quantum that they don't understand it.

His main complaint is that a lot of time he receives graduate student who don't know what he expects them to and it is because they aren't being properly educated.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physical_eric said:
My professor and I were talking today and he was suggesting that most physics texts are laden with math that is sometime unrelated to the problems at hand. His specific example was a question that asked the student to find the electromagnetic field at x if the field increases by a given exponential function. He asserted that electromagnetic fields increase linearly or like a sin wave (I might not be quoting him completely correctly, but that isn't the point), and that this problem doesn't give the student a real understanding of the phenomenon.
The lab I have with him is a lot of hands on with the student figuring out how the principles work and using them to find out what they need to know.

Are there any good textbooks that provide more than mathematical exercises and walk the student through a process that will end with a familiar and useful understanding of the material?
We are mostly talking about introductory physics, what are some alternative approaches that have been effective?

I have also heard many students argue that they get bogged down in the mathematical arguments of quantum that they don't understand it.

His main complaint is that a lot of time he receives graduate student who don't know what he expects them to and it is because they aren't being properly educated.

thanks.

This is a great question that I of course cannot answer. I sometimes feel like a bit of a fraud, as sometimes I can do the math without the depth of understanding i would like to have. I did have a professor who was way way way too mathy for the intro physics he taught, and most of the homework was frightening for me, but he assigned questions from "the flying circus of physics" (at least I think that was the name) each week. These required understanding the material - I don't recall needing any equations or even numbers for any of these. Almost totally qualitative requiring true understanding and real-world application of abstract theory. That is one good resource. The book may have solutions - we weren't told the source of the problems until the end of the semester.

I think that quantum mechanics is different from classical physics. Classical can be more easily understood based upon our intuition gleaned from everyday life and some "simple" lab experiments. I do not understand quantum, I must say. It seems like "intuition" is gained by doing a bunch of nasty math for a bunch of problems, until you train your mind to have some somehow expect certain types of results. Yes, there are some "simple" experiments, too, but those baffle me as well. General principles like uncertainty and correspondence help. But still, I will never truly understand it ... Not sure there is a short-cut for this one that bypasses the math. Hopefully those with better quantum understanding than me will chime in.


good luck

jason
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Back
Top