A Effective mass of the electron for Si

ZeroFunGame
Messages
93
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Which effective mass should I use?
https://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/effmass.htm#short

Looks like the effective mass for holes in Si can either be 0.57 or 0.81, according to the link above.

Is there a temperature regime where one effective mass should be used instead of the other?

Is anyone able to explain in layman's terms why the effective mass is disputed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two bands at \Gamma = 0, the light and heavy holes, each has their own band curvature which is related to the effective mass for each..
 
Forgive my ignorance, but what is gamma? If there's a link on this topic that I could read more on, that would be great! Thank you!
 
Effective mass depends on the shape of the band. So if in Si you have messy shaped bands you should expect the value of effective mass to change very much. But in the link you posted it is said that

  • 1 Due to the fact that the heavy hole band does not have a spherical symmetry there is a discrepancy between the actual effective mass for density of states and conductivity calculations (number on the right) and the calculated value (number on the left) which is based on spherical constant-energy surfaces. The actual constant-energy surfaces in the heavy hole band are "warped", resembling a cube with rounded corners and dented-in faces.

So basically I think they are telling you that the approximation they used to carry out the calculations about the structure of the band does not match with the other way of evaluating the effective mass (via the density of states, as I understood).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top