I Effective mass position dependent

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have some trouble understanding what to do when the effective mass in a heterostructure depends on position. Suppose for example that you have two materials, which are put together such that in one region the kinetic energy is described by one effective mass and in the other region another. How do you incorporate this into the Hamiltonian?
My first guess was to simply say that the kinetic energy is:
2/2m*(x) ∂2/∂x2
But thinking about it further I guess this does not work, since H is now no longer Hermitian necessarily. I looked up solutions for this and apparently the kinetic energy operator that does the job is:
2∂/∂x[1/m*(x)∂/∂x]
Now I am not sure how to see that this is indeed hermitian? Can anyone help me realize that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Partial integration
 
Hmm doing so I can move the outer derivative to the other side. But that does not prove it's hermitian? For that I want to prove that:
∫f ∂/∂x[1/m*(x)∂/∂x]g = ∫∂/∂x[1/m*(x)∂/∂x]f g
 
When exactly is an operator hermitian?
 
Hmm I think I wrote wrong. Hermiticity of an operator means that:
∫f*Ag = ∫(Af)*g
But I still don't see how integration by parts can give me this. It can move the outer derivative over to f but not the second?
 
That's a beginner's excercise. Show your precise steps
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top