Efficiently calculating the magnitude of gravitational force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational force between a uniform thin spherical shell and a particle using integration techniques. The shell is divided into narrow rings to simplify the calculations, with specific formulas provided for volume and mass. The integration process involves using angles and distances to derive the force exerted by the shell on the particle. While some participants suggest using Gauss's law and symmetry for a more efficient solution, others emphasize the necessity of calculus and the effectiveness of the ring integration method. Ultimately, the consensus is that while there may be alternative approaches, the integration method is straightforward and relies heavily on symmetry.
Richard Nash
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am reading Kolenkow and Kleppner's Classical Mechanics and they have tried to calculate the gravitational force between a uniform thin spherical shell of mass M and a particle of mass m located at a distance r from the center.


The shell has been divided into narrow rings.R has been assumed to be the radius of the shell with thickness t (t<<R). The ring at angle \theta which subtends angle d\theta has circumference 2\pi R\sin\theta.The volume is $$dV=2\pi R^2t\sin \theta d\theta$$ and its mass is $$pdV=2\pi R^2t\rho\sin\theta d\theta$$

If \alpha be the angle between the force vector and the line of centers, dF=\frac{Gm\rho dV}{r'^2}\cos\alpha where r' is the distance of each part of the ring from m.

Next, an integration has been carried out using $$\cos\alpha=\frac{r-R\cos\theta}{r'}$$ and $$r'=\sqrt{r'^2+R^2-2\pi R\cos\theta}$$

Question: I would like to avoid these calculations and I was wondering if there exists a better solution.
 
Science news on Phys.org
You can use Gauß' law and symmetry. But if you want to calculate it via an integral, I don't think there is an easier way.
 
Richard Nash said:
Question: I would like to avoid these calculations and I was wondering if there exists a better solution.
Welcome to PF!

You certainly need to use calculus. When one does this kind of calculus problem one has to use as much symmetry as possible. It seems that is achieved by dividing the sphere into rings perpendicular to the axis through the centre of the sphere and the point mass, calculating the gravity from a ring and integrating from one end to the other. If that is what they are doing, that is as simple as it gets.

AM
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top