Efficiently Compute the Inverse of a Matrix Using Tricky Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter peterlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the computation of the inverse of a matrix C, derived from the square of the entries of the inverse matrix B of an invertible matrix A. It is established that C is not necessarily invertible, leading to the conclusion that one cannot compute the inverse of C directly from A. When considering A as positive definite, the properties of B and C being positive definite are noted, but this does not change the inability to derive C's inverse from A. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of determinants and the implications of squaring matrix entries on invertibility. Ultimately, no general result can be guaranteed for computing the inverse of C from A.
peterlam
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Suppose A is a invertible n-by-n matrix. Let B be the inverse of A, i.e. B = A^(-1).It is trivial that A = B^(-1).

If we construct a matrix C whose entry is the square of corresponding entry of B, i.e. C_ij = (B_ij)^2, then we compute the inverse of C.

We can compute the inverse of C directly from A without going through the inverse operation twice?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
C is not necessarily invertible, so the answer to your question is "no".

For example
B = \begin{matrix} 1 & -1 \cr 1 & 1 \end{matrix}

C = \begin{matrix} 1 & 1 \cr 1 & 1 \end{matrix}
 
What if we only consider A is positive definite? Then B is positive definite and C should be positive definite too.

Can we compute the inverse of C directly from A in this case?

Thank you!
 
In my counterexample B is positive definite.

x^T B x = x_1^2 + x_2^2

You can write any inverse matrix explicitly in terms of determinants of the matrix and submatrices (this is equivalent to Cramer's rule for solving equations). Think about how a derminant is calculated, and what happens to it if you square all the entries in the matrix. I think it is very unlikely you will get any general result about this.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top