MHB Eggy's question at Yahoo Answers regarding optimization with constraint

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on optimizing the dimensions of a cone-shaped paper cup to minimize material while holding a fixed volume of 10 mL. Using Lagrange multipliers, the optimal height and radius are derived, leading to the equations h^2 = 2r^2 and specific formulas for h and r in terms of the volume. An alternative method is presented that involves differentiating the surface area and substituting the volume constraint, ultimately arriving at the same results for height and radius. Both approaches confirm that the height is h = (6V/π)^(1/3) and the radius is r = h/√2. The thread encourages further optimization problem discussions in the forum.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus Max Min problem help?

A cone-shaped paper drinking cup is to hold 10ml of water. What is height and radius of the cup that will require the least amount of paper?

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus Max Min problem help? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Eggy,

Using Lagrange multipliers, we have the objective function (using the formula for the lateral surface area of a cone):

$$f(h,r)=\pi r\sqrt{r^2+h^2}$$

subject to the constraint on the volume in ml:

$$g(h,r)=\frac{\pi}{3}hr^2-V=0$$

We have used the constant $V$ rather than the given value as we can just plug this in at the end of the problem.

Hence, we obtain the system:

$$\pi r\frac{h}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\lambda\left(\frac{\pi r^2}{3} \right)$$

$$\pi\left(r\frac{r}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}+\sqrt{r^2+h^2} \right)=\lambda\left(\frac{2\pi hr}{3} \right)$$

This system may be simplified to:

$$\frac{h}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\lambda\left(\frac{r}{3} \right)$$

$$\frac{2r^2+h^2}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\lambda\left(\frac{2hr}{3} \right)$$

Solving both equation for $\lambda$ and equating, we obtain:

$$\lambda=\frac{3h}{r\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\frac{3(2r^2+h^2)}{2hr\sqrt{r^2+r^2}}$$

This implies:

$$h^2=2r^2$$

Substituting into the constraint for $r^2$, we find:

$$\frac{\pi}{3}h\left(\frac{h^2}{2} \right)-V=0$$

Solving for $h$ we obtain:

$$h=\sqrt[3]{\frac{6V}{\pi}}$$

and so:

$$r=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{6V}{\pi}}}{\sqrt{2}}$$

Now, since $$V=10\text{ mL}$$, and $$1\text{ mL}=1\text{ cm}^3$$, we find that $r$ and $h$ in cm are:

$$h=\sqrt[3]{\frac{60}{\pi}}$$

$$r=\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{60}{\pi}}}{\sqrt{2}}$$

To Eggy and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Well, since I don't know about Lagrange Multipliers, this is how I would have done it:

A=\pi r\sqrt{r^2+h^2}

V=\dfrac{\pi}{3}hr^2

Keeping in mind that V is a constant (in this case 10).

Since we're minimizing the area, we need to differentiate A, but having r and h as variables, we need to use the expression for V to get h in terms or r, or r in terms of h. I'm going with h in terms of r.

V=\dfrac{\pi}{3}hr^2

h = \dfrac{3V}{\pi r^2}

Substituting in the area expression:

A=\pi r\sqrt{r^2+\dfrac{9V^2}{\pi^2 r^4}}

Or we could write it like this:

A=\sqrt{\pi^2r^2\left(r^2+\dfrac{9V^2}{\pi^2 r^4}\right)}

A=\sqrt{\pi^2r^4 + \dfrac{9V^2}{r^2}}

Differentiate and set to zero for optimum:

A'=\dfrac12 \left(\pi^2r^4 + \dfrac{9V^2}{r^2}\right)^{-0.5} \cdot \left(4\pi^2r^3 - \dfrac{18V^2}{r^3}\right) = 0

\dfrac{\left(2\pi^2r^3 - \dfrac{9V^2}{r^3}\right)}{\sqrt{\pi^2r^4 + \dfrac{9V^2}{r^2}}}=0

2\pi^2r^3 - \dfrac{9V^2}{r^3} = 0

r = \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}}

The height is then:

h = \dfrac{3V}{\pi \left(\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}}\right)^2}

Simplified to:

h = \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{6V}{\pi}}

Which are both the same as what Mark obtained. (Happy)

My method just maybe is a little longer/tedious because of many simplifications involved, but that's using the tools I know.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top