Eigen-energies and eigenstates of a tri-atomic system

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rafid Khanna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstates System
Rafid Khanna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An extra electron is added to one atom of a tri-atomic molecule. The electron has equal probability to jump to either of the other two atoms.

(a) Find the eigen-energies for the system. Assume that the new electron energy ##\bar{E_{0}}## is close to the non-hopping case energy ##E_{0}##. Draw an energy level diagram.

(b) Find one normalized eigenstate for the system.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) The only information available to me are that the the electron has equal probability to jump to either of the other two atoms. and the system has three atoms. How can these two pieces of information be used to find the eigen-energies of the system? Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you can assume that the three atoms are identical.
 
How might that help me? For now, all I can say is that the electron has the same eigen-energy for being in any of the three atoms i.e. in anyone of the three states.

Is that all I can say for the eigen-energies of the system?
 
I would also say that the model is somewhat ill specified. Did you do define "hopping" in class, maybe in connection with the Hubbard or Hueckel model? I think what you are supposed to assume is that the electron can be in one specific orbital on the atom, which is identical for all 3 atoms. Equal hopping probability translates into equal hamiltonian and overlap matrix elements between the orbitals. You then can set up some 3x3 Hamiltonian and Overlap matrix and try to solve it.
 
I think I will have to refer back to my QM textbooks and learn more about related topics before I can tackle this problem.

Can you please mention the topics that I must learn and be familiar with before I can answer this question?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top