Eigenvectors of 2*2 rotation matrix

In summary: So in this case we have $\langle v_1,v_2\rangle = 1\cdot1 + i\cdot(-i) = 1+1 = 2 \neq 0$ since these vectors are not orthogonal. In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a given matrix. The eigenvalues are found to be complex numbers and the corresponding eigenvectors are calculated using the formula A\lambda = \lambda V. However, when trying to show that the eigenvectors are orthogonal, there is a mistake in the calculation of the inner product. The correct definition of the inner product for complex vectors is used and it is shown that the eigenvectors are not orthogonal
  • #1
bugatti79
794
1
Hi Folks,

I calculate the eigenvalues of [tex]\begin{bmatrix}\cos \theta& \sin \theta \\ - \sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{bmatrix}[/tex] to be [tex]\lambda_1=e^{i \theta}[/tex] and [tex]\lambda_2=e^{-i \theta}[/tex]

for [tex]\lambda_1=e^{i \theta}=\cos \theta + i \sin \theta[/tex] I calculate the eigenvector via [tex]A \lambda = \lambda V[/tex] as

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}\cos -(\cos \theta+ i \sin \theta) & \sin \theta \\ - \sin \theta & \cos -(\cos \theta+ i \sin \theta)\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}v_1\\ v_2\end{bmatrix}=\vec{0}[/tex]

which reduces to

[tex]- i \sin \theta v_1+ \sin \theta v_2=0[/tex]
[tex]-\sin \theta v_1-i \sin \theta v_2=0[/tex]

I am stumped at this point...how shall I proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bugatti79 said:
Hi Folks,

I calculate the eigenvalues of [tex]\begin{bmatrix}\cos \theta& \sin \theta \\ - \sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{bmatrix}[/tex] to be [tex]\lambda_1=e^{i \theta}[/tex] and [tex]\lambda_2=e^{-i \theta}[/tex]

for [tex]\lambda_1=e^{i \theta}=\cos \theta + i \sin \theta[/tex] I calculate the eigenvector via [tex]A \lambda = \lambda V[/tex] as

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}\cos -(\cos \theta+ i \sin \theta) & \sin \theta \\ - \sin \theta & \cos -(\cos \theta+ i \sin \theta)\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}v_1\\ v_2\end{bmatrix}=\vec{0}[/tex]

which reduces to

[tex]- i \sin \theta v_1+ \sin \theta v_2=0[/tex]
[tex]-\sin \theta v_1-i \sin \theta v_2=0[/tex]

I am stumped at this point...how shall I proceed?
Divide those equations by $\sin\theta$ (assuming that $\sin\theta\ne0$).
 
  • #3
Opalg said:
Divide those equations by $\sin\theta$ (assuming that $\sin\theta\ne0$).

Then we get

[tex]- i v_1+ v_2=0[/tex] (1)
[tex]- v_1-i v_2=0[/tex] (2)

[tex]v_2=i v_1[/tex] from 1

[tex]v_2=-v_1/i[/tex] from 2

1) These contradict? How is the eigenvector obtained from this?

2) what if we have a situation where [tex]\theta=0[/tex]? Then [tex]\sin \theta=0[/tex]
 
  • #4
bugatti79 said:
Then we get

[tex]- i v_1+ v_2=0[/tex] (1)
[tex]- v_1-i v_2=0[/tex] (2)

[tex]v_2=i v_1[/tex] from 1

[tex]v_2=-v_1/i[/tex] from 2

1) These contradict? How is the eigenvector obtained from this?

2) what if we have a situation where [tex]\theta=0[/tex]? Then [tex]\sin \theta=0[/tex]
1) They don't contradict, because $i^2=-1$ and so $-1/i = i$.

2) If $\theta=0$ then the matrix becomes $\begin{bmatrix}1&0 \\0&1 \end{bmatrix}$ (the identity matrix), with a repeated eigenvalue $1$.
 
  • #5
Opalg said:
1) They don't contradict, because $i^2=-1$ and so $-1/i = i$.

2) If $\theta=0$ then the matrix becomes $\begin{bmatrix}1&0 \\0&1 \end{bmatrix}$ (the identity matrix), with a repeated eigenvalue $1$.

1) Ok, so the eigenvector for

[tex]\lambda_1=e^{i \theta}[/tex] is [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1\\ i\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

and

[tex]\lambda_2=e^{-i \theta}[/tex] is [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1/i\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

To show these 2 vectors are orthogonal I get the inner product

[tex]<v_1,v_2>=(1*1)+(i*1/i)\ne 0[/tex] but I expect 0...?
 
  • #6
bugatti79 said:
1) Ok, so the eigenvector for

[tex]\lambda_1=e^{i \theta}[/tex] is [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1\\ i\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

and

[tex]\lambda_2=e^{-i \theta}[/tex] is [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1/i\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

To show these 2 vectors are orthogonal I get the inner product

[tex]<v_1,v_2>=(1*1)+(i*1/i)\ne 0[/tex] but I expect 0...?
The definition of the inner product of two complex vectors is that you have to take the complex conjugate of the second one: if $x = ( x_1,x_2)$ and $y = (y_1,y_2)$ then $\langle x,y\rangle = x_1\overline{y_1} + x_2\overline{y_2}.$
 

1. What is a rotation matrix?

A rotation matrix is a square matrix that represents a rotation transformation in a multidimensional space. In a 2-dimensional space, a rotation matrix is a 2x2 matrix that describes a rotation around the origin point.

2. What are eigenvectors of a 2x2 rotation matrix?

Eigenvectors of a 2x2 rotation matrix are vectors that do not change direction when multiplied by the rotation matrix. In other words, these vectors are only scaled by a scalar value when multiplied by the rotation matrix.

3. How many eigenvectors does a 2x2 rotation matrix have?

A 2x2 rotation matrix always has two eigenvectors, as it is a 2-dimensional matrix. However, these eigenvectors may be complex numbers if the rotation angle is not a multiple of pi/2.

4. What is the relationship between eigenvectors and eigenvalues in a 2x2 rotation matrix?

Eigenvectors and eigenvalues are closely related in a 2x2 rotation matrix. Eigenvectors are the direction of the rotation, while eigenvalues represent the magnitude of the rotation. The eigenvalues of a 2x2 rotation matrix are always complex numbers with a magnitude of 1.

5. How do I calculate the eigenvectors of a 2x2 rotation matrix?

To calculate the eigenvectors of a 2x2 rotation matrix, you can use the formula v = (a - lambda) / b, where a and b are the elements of the rotation matrix and lambda is the eigenvalue. This will give you two eigenvectors, one for each eigenvalue.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
717
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
959
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top