Einstein-Strauss solution with one or two bubbles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter smallphi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubbles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Einstein-Strauss solution models a gravitationally bound system within a homogeneous Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe, featuring a black hole at the center of a spherical bubble. The mass of the black hole matches the mass that would exist in the bubble under a fully FRW solution, allowing the surrounding FRW universe to expand without being influenced by the bubble. Inside the bubble, the metric is Schwarzschild, remaining unaffected by the expanding universe. In scenarios with two non-overlapping bubbles, the metric inside each bubble remains Schwarzschild, despite the lack of spherical symmetry, as symmetry arguments still apply due to the spherically symmetric boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's equations
  • Familiarity with Schwarzschild metric
  • Knowledge of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology
  • Concept of Birkhoff's theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Birkhoff's theorem in non-linear systems
  • Study the Schwarzschild solution in various cosmological contexts
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of the Einstein equations
  • Investigate the principle of superposition in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and researchers focusing on general relativity and gravitational theories, particularly those interested in the dynamics of black holes and cosmological models.

smallphi
Messages
436
Reaction score
2
The Einstein-Strauss solution of Einstein equations is used to model a gravitationally bound system in otherwise homogeneuous FRW universe.

It is a black hole at the center of an otherwise empty spherical bubble surrounded by expanding FRW matter dominated universe. The mass of the black hole is set equal to the mass that would be in the bubble if it the solution was FRW everywhere. With that matching, the FRW solution outside the bubble doesn't 'feel' the presense of the bubble and expands as if the bubble doesn't exist.

The metric inside the bubble is Shwartzschild and doesn't 'feel' the expanding universe surrounding it. Can we say that this is a result of some version of the Birkhoff theorem: since the spacetime considered is spherically symmetric, the metric inside the bubble should depend only on the mass inside i.e. on the black hole only?

The opinion in the field is that nothing changes in the case of two non-overlapping bubbles with black holes at their centers immersed in expanding matter dominated FRW (masses of black holes matched to FRW mass as usual). The metric inside each bubble is still Schwarzschild corresponding to the mass of the black hole and doesn't 'feel' the expanding universe outside.

Birkhoff theorem cannot be evoked in this case since the spherical symmetry of spacetime is broken by the presense of two bubbles. 'Principle of superposition' i.e. slap the second bubble on the spacetime of one bubble in expanding FRW and nothing will change, cannot be used either since Einstein equations are not linear.

What would be the rigorous reasoning to justify the conclusion that the metric inside both bubbles is still schwarzshild despite the fact the spacetime is no longer spherically symmetric?

All I can think about is: guess the solution and just plug in Einstein eq. to prove its consistent. Is there more elegant argument?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smallphi said:
What would be the rigorous reasoning to justify the conclusion that the metric inside both bubbles is still schwarzshild despite the fact the spacetime is no longer spherically symmetric?
Around each bubble you can make a spherically symmetric boundary. Since within that boundary the source is spherically symmetric and since on the boundary the fields are spherically symmetric you can still use arguments of spherical symmetry to get the solution within that region.

Note, this is not a superposition argument. You are correct that the equations are non linear, but although they are nonlinear the symmetry arguments still apply as long as both the matter and the boundary conditions reflect the same symmetry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K