Einstein Tensor and Stress Energy Tensor of Scalar Field

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
Phinrich
Messages
82
Reaction score
14
TL;DR
What is the connection, if any, between the Einstein Tensor and the Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field ?
Hi All.

Given that we may write

Equation1.png


And that the Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field may be written as;

Equation 2.png

These two Equations seem to have a similar form.

Is this what would be expected or is it just coincidence?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK I think this is self evident. All we are saying is that the right side of the first Equation = the right side of the second equation. Nothing sinister.

Give me the prize for Raspberry of the Month
 
Thats not even the Einstein Tensor that's the Ricci Tensor.
 
Phinrich said:
Summary: What is the connection, if any, between the Einstein Tensor and the Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field ?

The fact that the Einstein tensor equals the Stress-Energy tensor (times a constant that depends on your choice of units) according to the Einstein Field Equation. (This is true for any stress-energy tensor, not just the stress-energy tensor of a scalar field.)

However, as has been pointed out, ##R_{\mu \nu}## is not the Einstein tensor, it's the Ricci tensor. The Einstein tensor is

$$
G_{\mu \nu} = R_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu \nu} R^\alpha{}_\alpha
$$

And the Einstein Field Equation is just ##G_{\mu \nu} = 8 \pi T_{\mu \nu}## (in natural units where ##G = c = 1##). The equation in the Ricci tensor that you derived is obtained by "trace reversing" the Einstein Field Equation--taking the trace of the EFE to obtain ##- R^\alpha{}_\alpha = 8 \pi T^\alpha{}_\alpha## and then rearranging terms to put the trace on the RHS.

The specific form of ##T_{\mu \nu}## depends on the kind of matter and energy that are present.

Phinrich said:
the Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field may be written as

Where are you getting that from? It doesn't look like the SET of a scalar field that I'm familiar with.