Einstein vs Newton: Why Did Einstein Challenge Newton's View of Gravity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Einstein challenged Newton's view of gravity by introducing the concept of spacetime, asserting that gravity is not an instantaneous force but rather propagates at the speed of light. This perspective allows for a more elegant explanation of gravitational phenomena, such as the perihelion shift of Mercury and the curvature of light. Einstein's General Relativity (GR) provides a framework that aligns with experimental measurements, demonstrating the limitations of Newton's classical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with Newtonian physics
  • Basic knowledge of spacetime concepts
  • Awareness of gravitational phenomena and their measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of General Relativity on gravitational wave detection
  • Explore the perihelion shift of Mercury and its significance in GR
  • Investigate the role of light curvature in gravitational lensing
  • Learn about time dilation effects in varying gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of astrophysics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of gravity and the evolution of scientific thought regarding gravitational theories.

aaron35510
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If gravity is a force, then the moment the object producing gravity is taken away, it should result in gravity taken away instantaneously.
However, why does Einstein say that Newton's classical mechanics are incorrect and that in fact he decided to propose spacetime and not follow what Newton has claimed hundreds of years ago?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity travels at the speed of light. If you take the object producing gravity away, you stop feeling its gravity as soon as you stop seeing it. I don't see any reason why a force would need to act instantaneously. In quantum mechanics, for example, forces are transmitted by special kinds of particles, which travel at the speed of light.

Einstein said Newton's laws were incorrect because they didn't perfectly fit into his theory, which seemed more elegant. His own results explained gravity in a different way which felt more consistent. It turns out he was right, because GR explains the perihelion shift of Mercury, curvature of light (double the Newtonian value), time dilation in gravitational fields (measured in experiments) and quite a few other things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K