A Einstein's Elevator Trajectories: Desloge & Philpott 1987, Hamilton 1978

Mathieu Rouaud
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Newton's theory predicts parabolic trajectories. But what kind of trajectories within the framework of Special Relativity?
Hello,
Some papers describe the vertical motion of a ray of light or a non-zero mass particle in a uniformly accelerated reference frame in special relativity:
  • Desloge, E. A., & Philpott, R. J. (1987). Uniformly accelerated reference frames in special relativity. American Journal of Physics, 55(3), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15197 (world lines on page 258)
  • Hamilton, J. D. (1978). The uniformly accelerated reference frame. American Journal of Physics, 46(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.11169 (world lines for a ray of light on page 85, for a massive particle on page 86)
But in the case of a non-vertical initial velocity what is the trajectory? What kind of curve does a particle draw on a vertical wall of the elevator? Do you know reference papers or books on this subject?
Thank you for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A point particle in a homogeneous electric field, neglecting radiation reaction, realizes a particle with constant proper acceleration. The trajectories are hyperbolae.
 
Wikipedia (Rindler coordinates): "we obtain a picture which looks suspiciously like the family of all semicircles through a point and orthogonal to the Rindler horizon"
Thus, the trajectories of photons in the accelerated elevator seem to be circular!
 
Mathieu Rouaud said:
Wikipedia (Rindler coordinates): "we obtain a picture which looks suspiciously like the family of all semicircles through a point and orthogonal to the Rindler horizon"
Thus, the trajectories of photons in the accelerated elevator seem to be circular!
Semi-circular, yes. Given of course a very large elevator where spacetime is still flat.
 
Well, but circles in a Lorentzian plane are in fact hyperbolae (or light cones), namely (in "Minkoski-Cartesian coordinates")
$$\eta_{\mu \nu} x^{\mu} x^{\nu}=\text{const}.$$
See the picture in Wikipedia just close the quoted passage.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top