B Einstein's Epiphany of Constant Light Speed

thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
How did Einstein first contemplate the idea that the speed of light was constant in all frames or reference?
Did he say "I wonder what would happen if we considered light speed to be constant" in some kind of thought experiment. Did the concept fall serendipitously from the results of calculations?

I'm just wondering how it would occur to someone to think of that when additive velocities were just generally assumed. The very idea of a constant light speed was so bizarre in that realm of thought that I'm curious, especially when time being a linear constant was so accepted. I'm sure the story is out there but I can't find it.

tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea that the speed of light was constant actually predates Einstein I believe. If I remember correctly, it dates back to the mid-1800's when classical electrodynamics was developed fully and certain problems were noticed. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_special_relativity
 
thetexan said:
How did Einstein first contemplate the idea that the speed of light was constant in all frames or reference?
Did he say "I wonder what would happen if we considered light speed to be constant" in some kind of thought experiment. Did the concept fall serendipitously from the results of calculations?

I'm just wondering how it would occur to someone to think of that when additive velocities were just generally assumed. The very idea of a constant light speed was so bizarre in that realm of thought that I'm curious, especially when time being a linear constant was so accepted. I'm sure the story is out there but I can't find it.

tex
It was an observation. Experiments showed the speed of light is invariant.

Relativity was an explanation

Sent from my SM-G550T2 using Physics Forums mobile app
 
thetexan said:
How did Einstein first contemplate the idea that the speed of light was constant in all frames or reference?

I think he claimed it came from his study of electromagnetism. If a loop of wire is moved relative to a stationary magnet a current arises in the wire. And if a magnet is moved relative to a stationary loop of wire a current arises in the wire. Einstein was able to show that these two interactions are the same, a symmetry that was lacking in the laws of electrodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Mister T said:
I think he claimed it came from his study of electromagnetism. If a loop of wire is moved relative to a stationary magnet a current arises in the wire. And if a magnet is moved relative to a stationary loop of wire a current arises in the wire. Einstein was able to show that these two interactions are the same, a symmetry that was lacking in the laws of electrodynamics.
This is what I gathered from reading On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.

Edit- might as well post it to save someone a google search.

https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top