Elastic Collision 4: Final Velocities

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about an elastic collision involving two identical masses, participants analyzed the final velocities after one mass collides with another at rest. They referenced the conservation of momentum and energy equations, highlighting the symmetry in the variables involved. A key point raised was the importance of correctly applying the equations to avoid errors, as different methods can yield misleading results if substitutions are incorrect. The conclusion emphasized that both masses can end up with one being stationary while the other moves, depending on the initial conditions. Overall, the conversation clarified that consistent application of the equations should lead to the same valid outcomes.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Two identical masses collide. one is at rest. what are their final velocities.

Homework Equations


The relative velocities before and after the collision are identical:
##v_1-v_2=-(u_1-u_2)##

The Attempt at a Solution


I draw the final velocities in the same direction:
\left\{ \begin{array}{l} mv_1=mu_1+mu_2 \\ -v_1=-(u_1-u_2) \end{array} \right.
It gives $$u_2=0$$ which isn't true, u1 should be 0.
And more, i can switch between u1 and u2 in the drawing and it will also be good since they are drawn in the same direction, so, how do i know who stops?
I get this answer also if i use the conservation of energy formula instead of the relative velocities formula.
If i draw u1 backwards and change the formula in accordance:
##\left\{ \begin{array}{l} mv_1=mu_1-mu_2 \\ -v_1=-(u_1-u_2) \end{array} \right.##
I again get the same result: $$u_2=0$$
Apart from the question i posed, do i have to assume a direction and then write the formuls accordingly or i have always to write:
##\left\{ \begin{array}{l} mv_1=mu_1+mu_2 \\ -v_1=-(u_1-u_2) \end{array} \right.##
 

Attachments

  • Snap1.jpg
    Snap1.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 400
Physics news on Phys.org
Karol said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I draw the final velocities in the same direction:
\left\{ \begin{array}{l} mv_1=mu_1+mu_2 \\ -v_1=-(u_1-u_2) \end{array} \right.
The left hand side of the second equation should be ##v_1##, not ##-v_1##.
 
--

Thanks, it solved it.
I used the next set of equations:
\left\{ \begin{array}{l} mv_1=mu_1+mu_2 \\ \frac{1}{2}mv^2_1=\frac{1}{2}mu^2_1+\frac{1}{2}mu^2_2 \end{array} \right.
##\Rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l} v_1=u_1+u_2 \\ v^2_1=u^2_1+u^2_2 \end{array} \right.##
I isolated u1:
##\Rightarrow v^2_1=(v_1+u_2)^2+u^2_2##
And got the same answer, good. but when i solved the same set of equations by isolating v1 i got a different answer:
##(u_1+u_2)^2=u^2_1+u^2_2 \rightarrow u_1 u_2=0##
Do you know this behavior of sets of equations, that you get different answers by using different ways?
 
No, you will not get different answers by doing it different ways. The statement ##u_1 u_2 = 0## simply tells you that either ##u_1## or ##u_2## is zero after the collision, both of which are perfectly valid roots (##u_2 = 0## corresponds to the balls not having collided yet).

The equations you have are symmetric in ##u_1## and ##u_2## so if ##u_1 = 0, u_2 = U## is a solution, then also ##u_1 = U, u_2 = 0## must be a solution.
 
Karol said:
I used the next set of equations:
\left\{ \begin{array}{l} mv_1=mu_1+mu_2 \\ \frac{1}{2}mv^2_1=\frac{1}{2}mu^2_1+\frac{1}{2}mu^2_2 \end{array} \right.
##\Rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l} v_1=u_1+u_2 \\ v^2_1=u^2_1+u^2_2 \end{array} \right.##
Realize that these equations are equivalent to those you used earlier.

I isolated u1:
##\Rightarrow v^2_1=(v_1+u_2)^2+u^2_2##
And got the same answer, good.
You made an error in your substitution. ##u_1 \ne v_1+u_2##.

but when i solved the same set of equations by isolating v1 i got a different answer:
##(u_1+u_2)^2=u^2_1+u^2_2 \rightarrow u_1 u_2=0##
This time you did it correctly.

Do you know this behavior of sets of equations, that you get different answers by using different ways?
Only when you make an error. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top