Elastic Collision of two objects

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision problem, a 5.5 kg object moving at 5.5 m/s collides with a 2.5 kg object moving at -4.0 m/s. The conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations are applied to find the final velocities of both masses. The initial calculations led to a quadratic equation, but the solutions obtained (5.51 and -0.448) were incorrect. A suggestion was made to double-check the quadratic solution, indicating that the previous work was mostly correct but contained an error in the final calculations. Correctly solving the quadratic will yield the accurate final velocities for both objects.
Bowenj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5.5 kg object moving in the +x direction at 5.5 m/s collides head-on with a 2.5 kg object moving in the -x direction at 4.0 m/s. Find the final velocity of each mass for each of the following situations. (Take the positive direction to be +x.) The equation is elastic


Homework Equations


m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

.5m1(v1)2+.5m1(v1)2= 5m1(v1')2+5m2(v2)2


The Attempt at a Solution



I plugged the numbers into the first equation, and solved for v2', which gave me 8.1-2.2v1'=v2'

Then i substitued this into the second equation, which gave me
103.1875=.5(5.5)(v1')^2+(.5)(2.5)(8.1-2.2(v1'))^2

then i simplified and go

103.1875 = 2.75(v1')^2+1.25(65.61-35.64v1'+4.84(v1')^2)

I simplified again and got

0= 8.8(v1')^2-44.55v1'-21.175

Okay so then i used the quadratic equation and got 5.51 and -.448, but neither one of those answers are right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bowenj said:
0= 8.8(v1')^2-44.55v1'-21.175

Okay so then i used the quadratic equation and got 5.51 and -.448, but neither one of those answers are right.
Double check your solution for that quadratic. Your answers are off a bit. (And solving that quadratic correctly does give the correct answer, so your work up to that point is good.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top