Elastic relativistic collisions

AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly elastic relativistic collision, rest mass is not conserved, while momentum, energy, and angular momentum are conserved. Non-relativistic concepts of conservation do not fully apply to relativistic collisions, leading to confusion about which quantities remain constant. Experiments validate that relativistic momentum is conserved even in inelastic collisions, and rest mass is defined to be conserved in such scenarios. Energy conservation is confirmed through the relationship involving momentum and mass. Overall, both momentum and angular momentum conservation hold true in relativistic collisions when analyzed correctly.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# In a perfectly elastic relativistic collision, which one of the following quantities is not conserved:
a)Momentum
b)Energy
c)Rest mass
d)Angular momentum
In non relativistic elastic collisions, energy and momentum will be conserved. But I don’t know about relativistic elastic collisions. Could anyone please clear my doubt? Can we apply the Newtonian concepts in these cases? Suppose the collision is inelastic (relativistic), then which quantity will be conserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm puzzled. As far as I know, there is no way to prove conservation of momentum. However, experiments confirm that relativistic momentum is conserved in inelastic collisions (such as particle collisions). Rest mass is conserved by definition of an inelastic collision. Energy is \sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4} so it is conserved since p and m are. Regarding the angular momentum, if you take the coordinate system in which the collision is monitored to have its origin at the point of collision, then angular momentum before and after the collision are 0. So, angular momentum is conserved too.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top