MHB Elasticity of Demand problem help

  • Thread starter Thread starter hallie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elasticity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the elasticity of demand using the price-demand equation x=f(p)=20,000-550p. The user struggles with simplifying the elasticity formula E(p)=pf'(p)/f(p) and seeks clarification on reaching the final answer E(p)=11p/(400-11p). Another participant explains that dividing both the numerator and denominator by -50 simplifies the equation while reducing the number of negative signs. The conversation emphasizes the preference for a cleaner mathematical expression and concludes with appreciation for the explanation provided.
hallie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I know this may seem like a dumb question, but I just can't seem to get by one part of each elasticity of demand problem I come across. For example:

Use the​ price-demand equation below to find​ E(p), the elasticity of demand.
x=f(p)=20,000-550p

I know that E(p)=pf'(p)/f(p), so in this problem that would get me E(p)=p(-550)/20,000-550p, but after that, I am unsure of how to divide the equation in order to simplify it.
I know the answer is E(p)=11p-/400-11p, but if anyone could tell me how to divide/simplify the equation in order to get to that answer, I would be extremely grateful.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, it looks like you have derived:

$$E(p)=\frac{-550p}{20000-550p}$$

Now if we divide the numerator and denominator by -50, we obtain:

$$E(p)=\frac{11p}{11p-400}$$

Does this make sense?
 
Where do you get the -50 from?
 
hallie said:
Where do you get the -50 from?

Since there is a minus sign on one of the terms in the denominator and a minus sign on the numerator, if we divide by a negative number, then we will only have 1 minus sign in the denominator. I prefer the form:

$$\frac{a}{b-c}$$

over:

$$\frac{-a}{c-b}$$

Even though they are equivalent, I like fewer negatives. Then if we look at 550 and 20000, we see that 50 is the GCD, so dividing each term by -50 will result in the simplest terms in the form with fewer negative signs. :)
 
MarkFL said:
Since there is a minus sign on one of the terms in the denominator and a minus sign on the numerator, if we divide by a negative number, then we will only have 1 minus sign in the denominator. I prefer the form:

$$\frac{a}{b-c}$$

over:

$$\frac{-a}{c-b}$$

Even though they are equivalent, I like fewer negatives. Then if we look at 550 and 20000, we see that 50 is the GCD, so dividing each term by -50 will result in the simplest terms in the form with fewer negative signs. :)

Perfect! Thank you so much for this explanation! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top