Electomagnetic wave frequency and photons

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
donaldson1967
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If i calculate the frequency of light with λ = 600nm ...
Frequency (v) = c/λ
= 49.9654 x 1012 Hz (waves per second)
Can i say this is the frequency of photons i.e. 49.9654 x 1012 Hz (waves per second)
Thanks DD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
donaldson1967 said:
If i calculate the frequency of light with λ = 600nm ...
Frequency (v) = c/λ
= 49.9654 x 1012 Hz (waves per second)
Can i say this is the frequency of photons i.e. 49.9654 x 1012 Hz (waves per second)
Thanks DD

The exponent should be 14 and not 12, but yes this is the frequency of the photons.
 
thanks - but i still calculate it as

λ = 600nm
c = 299792458 m/s
Frequency (v) = c/λ
= 49.9654 x 10*12 Hz

not 10*14

??
 
okay
i still get 49.9654 x 10*12 Hz
going a bit crazy
sorry i must be gaving a cerebral infarct
BUT 600 nm = 600 x10-9?
so 299 792 458 / 600 x 10 -9 = .. 4.99 x 10*13 = 49.9 x 10*12?
 
donaldson1967 said:
okay
i still get 49.9654 x 10*12 Hz
going a bit crazy
sorry i must be gaving a cerebral infarct
BUT 600 nm = 600 x10-9?
so 299 792 458 / 600 x 10 -9 = .. 4.99 x 10*13 = 49.9 x 10*12?

Try it approximately first.

f=c/[tex]\lambda[/tex]=3x108/6x10-7=0.5x1015=5x1014
 
Okay- thanks a million- sorry for being a bit inadequate
d
 
donaldson1967 said:
Okay- thanks a million- sorry for being a bit inadequate
d

The mind does strange things to us sometimes, doesn't it? :smile:

Unfortunately, it gets worse as we get older.
 
Excellent news - something else to look forward to (along with general physical decay)- thanks again - great help
DD