Electric charges and large bodies

AI Thread Summary
Large bodies like the Earth and the Moon have a net electric charge close to zero, which can seem contradictory given the presence of magnetic fields. The Earth's magnetic field is generated by moving electric currents rather than a net charge. Electric fields and magnetic fields are distinct phenomena; the existence of a magnetic field does not imply a net electric charge. If the Earth had a significant net charge, it would produce an electric field. Understanding these differences clarifies the relationship between electric and magnetic properties in large bodies.
kenewbie
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
According to my book the electric charge of large bodies like the Earth and the moon is pretty close to zero. But the Earth has poles and a magnetic field, which suggests that it isn't uniformly distributed at all. These two things SEEM contradictory to me, what is it that I am not getting?

k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that electric fields and magnetic fields are not the same thing, the fact that the Earth has a magnetic field has nothing to do with its net charge. Magnetism is caused by currents - moving charge - but there does not need to be a net charge for there to be a current.

Now, if the Earth had a net charge, or if the charge in the Earth was not distributed very prettily, the planet would produce an electric field.
 
That made a lot of sense thank you
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top