How Does Jackson's Use of Manifolds Enhance Understanding of Electrodynamics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Jackson's "Electrodynamics" utilizes the concept of manifolds to enhance the understanding of electromagnetic fields by mapping functions from a base manifold M to a target manifold T. Specifically, the discussion highlights that a field X can be represented as a function from R3 * R1 to R3, emphasizing the necessity of manifolds for defining fields on topologically complex spaces, such as S^n. The use of manifolds allows for the consideration of boundaries and geometries that are not homeomorphic to R^m, facilitating practical applications in electromagnetism and simplifying complex integrations through the generalized Stokes theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry and manifolds
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field theory
  • Knowledge of topology, particularly homeomorphism concepts
  • Basic grasp of integration techniques in higher dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the generalized Stokes theorem and its applications in electromagnetism
  • Explore the properties of manifolds and their role in physics
  • Learn about the topology of spheres and their implications for field definitions
  • Investigate practical applications of manifolds in engineering, particularly in waveguides and antennas
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and engineers interested in advanced electromagnetism, particularly those focusing on the application of manifold theory in practical scenarios.

kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
This is from Jackson, "Electrodynamics"
a field is a fuction mapping phi: M -> T, x -> phi(x) from a base manifold M into a target manifold T.

field X: R3 * R1 -> R3
x(r,t) ->X(x)I think this is eucledian R4 to R3 so I wonder why Jackson explained this with the concept of manifolds?
Is it necessary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Impossible to say unless you specify what X is.
 
Orodruin said:
Impossible to say unless you specify what X is.
http://www.thp.uni-koeln.de/alexal/pdf/electrodynamics.pdf

its on section 1.2.1 and field X is any arbitary EM fields (E,D,B,H)
 
kidsasd987 said:
This is from Jackson, "Electrodynamics"
a field is a fuction mappingphi: M -> T, x -> phi(x) from a base manifold M into a target manifold T.

field X: R3 * R1 -> R3
x(r,t) ->X(x)I think this is eucledian R4 to R3 so I wonder why Jackson explained this with the concept of manifolds?
Is it necessary?

It is necessary if you want to consider spaces which have topologies other than that of R^n. For example a field on an n-dimensional sphere S^n.
If you restrict yourself to defining a field as a function from R^m to R^n, then you could not define a field on S^n as a global function because S^n is not homeomorphic to R^m for any n, m >= 0. In the example you mention here, the domain space is just R^4 with the usual topology and diferentiable structure, but this space is of course a manifold so it fits in the definition the book gives.
 
Consider also that in practical applications, the boundaries of a particular region might not be made up of chunks of planes isometric to R2. Often the boundary of a cavity or waveguide, or the surfaces of antennas and reflectors are best described as two dimensional manifolds rather than as subsets of R3 or R3,1.
Also, thinking in terms of manifolds makes some nice simplifications and generalizations easier later on, like using the generalized Stokes theorem for all integration over bounded regions, curves, or surfaces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
620
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
927
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K