Electric Field Around A Dipole?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding an electric field problem involving a dipole, specifically questioning why all charges are labeled as "2." Participants clarify that the problem statement explicitly defines the charges as "2," indicating no mistake by the teacher. The conversation also highlights that there are three charges involved in the scenario, emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the problem setup. Overall, the thread addresses misconceptions about the charge values and the number of charges in the dipole configuration. Understanding the problem statement is crucial for solving electric field questions related to dipoles.
PurelyPhysical
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
http://imgur.com/48cLE6q

I can't follow this. Did my teacher make a mistake? Why are all the charges 2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All the charges are "2" because the problem statement says they are.
Why would you expect anything different?

... anyway - there are three charges in the problem so what are you talking about?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top