Electric Field: Calculate Electric Field at Centre of Triangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of an equilateral triangle with sides measuring 15.6 cm, featuring a charge of +2 µC at one vertex and -4 µC charges at the other two vertices. The initial calculations incorrectly used the distance from the vertex to the center as 0.156 m instead of the correct centroid distance of 0.078 m. After revising the calculations and incorporating the signs of the charges, the final electric field strength was determined to be approximately 3.7 x 10^3 N/C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law for electric fields
  • Knowledge of vector addition in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of the centroid of a triangle
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions, specifically between microcoulombs and coulombs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of vector addition in electric fields
  • Learn about the centroid calculation for different polygon shapes
  • Explore the implications of charge polarity in electric field calculations
  • Review the application of Coulomb's Law in complex charge configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, or anyone involved in electrostatics and electric field calculations.

jg95ae
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if I've done this question correctly:

An equilateral triangle with sides of 15.6 cm, and a charge of +2 uC at one vertex, and charges if -4uC each at the other two. Determine the electric field at the centre of the triangle.

Basically what I've done is figure out the electric charge for each point, and then add them together. I'm not sure if this is even correct, and even if it is I'm not sure I understand why - I'm struggling a bit with the concepts.

E1 = kQ1/r^2 = (9 x 10^9)(0.002)/(0.156)^2 = 7.39 x 10^8 N/C
E2 = - 1.47 x 10^9 N/C
E3 = -1.47 x 10^9 N/c

Adding these three fields I got - 7.31 x 10^8 N/C as the electric field at the centre.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think what you've done it quite correct, because you need the electric field at the centre of the triangle, therefore r\neq 0.156. HINT: It may be easier if you combine the two negative charges into a single charge, i.e. find the centre of charge as you do for the centre of gravity. Then the problem just becomes a simple two charge particles problem.

Do you follow?

~H
 
Thanks, I realize now that r is definitely not 0.156.

I'm not sure I understand the centre of charge. Does this mean that at the middle the point charge would also be -4uC?
I figured similar to centre of gravity, that 4(0.156)/2(4) = 0.078 m

So at 0.078 m the charge would be -4uC

Based on a right triangle, the total distance from the new point charge to the top of the triangle would be 0.135 m, and therefore the centre would be at 0.0675m.

Now I just added the electric fields:
E = (9 x10^9)(4 x 10-6)/(0.0675)^2 + (9 x10^9)(2 x 10-6)/(0.0675)^2
E = 1.18 x 10^2 N/C

Does this look correct now?
 
Ahh sorry, I think I've mislead you hear, centre of charge is not applicable. You must take the vector sum of the components, this page is useful http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/mulpoi.html#c2 . As the triangle is equilateral the distance (r) of the centroid of the triangle will be 0.078m. I realized my error this moring, but couldn't get to a computer to check it.

Please accept my apology.

~H
 
No problem I was thinking that it was all seeming a little too easy.
So I've reworked the problem given the information provided above.

The first thing is that I think that the centre is actually at 6.8cm, based on creating a right angled triangle and finding the height (13.5cm). Therefore the centre would be at half the height = 6.8cm

So based on r = 0.068:
E1 = kQ1/r^2 = (9 x 10^9)(0.002)/(0.068)^2 = 3.89 x 10^6 N/C
E2 = 7.79 x 10^6 N/C
E3 = 7.79 x 10^6 N/C

Then I found E1x, E2x, and E3x using Ecos30
E1x = 3.37x10^6, E2x = 6.75 x 10^6, E3x = 6.75 x 10^6
Adding these together Ex = 1.69 x 10^7

Then E1y, E2y, E3y using Esin30
E1y = 1.95x10^6, E2y = 3.89x 10^6, E3y = 3.89x 10^6
Adding these together Ey = 9.73 x 10^6

Therefore E = sqrt[(1.69 x 10^7)^2 + (9.73 x 10^6)^2]
E = 1.95 x 10^7

First does this like I'm doing it right now? And secondly I have not taken the negative charges into consideration and am wondering if I need to do so?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
jg95ae said:
First does this like I'm doing it right now? And secondly I have not taken the negative charges into consideration and am wondering if I need to do so?

Your method looks ok, however as you say, you haven't taken into account the polarity of the charges. Note that the electric field of a single point charge is given by;

E = \frac{kQ}{r^2}

All you need to do is make sure you substitute the value in with the positive or negative sign.. For example for one of the negative charges you would use Q = -4\times 10^{-6}. Just one thing I need to check when you write "uC" do you mean "milli" or "micro" coulombs? Milli (m) = 10^{-3} and Micro (\mu) = 10^{-6}.

~H
 
I did mess up the units.

So now I have:
E1 = kQ1/r^2 = (9 x 10^9)(2 x 10^-6)/(0.068)^2 =1.22 x 10^3 N/C
E2 = -2.45 x 10^3 N/C
E3 = -2.45 x 10^3 N/C

Then
E1x = 1.06 x 10^3, E2x = -2.12 x 10^3, E3x = -2.12 x 10^3
Adding these together Ex = -3.18 x 10^3

Then
E1y = 6.1 x 10^2, E2y = -1.23 x 10^3, E3y = -1.23 x 10^3
Adding these together Ey = -1.85 x 10^3

Therefore E = sqrt[(-3.18 x 10^3)^2 + (-1.85 x 10^3)^2]
E = 3.7 x 10^3

Does this look better now with the charges put in?

Thanks so much for the help
 
Yeah, that looks good to me (I assume that you've punched the numbers into your calculator correctly:wink:). Don't forget the units of electric field strength, most tutors deduct marks for incorrect or missing units!

Again I apologise for the error at the start (I don't know what I was thinking!)

~H
 
No problem, thank you for the much needed help!
 
  • #10
jg95ae said:
So now I have:
E1 = kQ1/r^2 = (9 x 10^9)(2 x 10^-6)/(0.068)^2 =1.22 x 10^3 N/C

Check you math here. I calculated 3.89 x 10^6 N/C
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
849
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K