Electric field in a hollow cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the electric field magnitude in the region between the inner and outer radii of a thick hollow cylinder with a non-uniform volume charge density. The specific question pertains to the limits of integration when calculating the enclosed charge.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the limits of integration for finding the enclosed charge when applying Gauss' theorem, specifically whether to integrate from the inner radius to the outer radius or just to the variable radius.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the application of Gauss' theorem and clarifying the integration limits. Some guidance has been provided regarding the appropriate limits for the integration based on the specified region of interest.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is constrained by the specific conditions of the problem, particularly the requirement to find the electric field in the region defined by Rin < r < Rout.

magnifik
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
An infinitely long thick hollow cylinder has inner radius Rin and outer radius Rout. It has a non-uniform volume charge density, ρ(r) = ρ0r/Rout where r is the distance from the cylinder axis. What is the electric field magnitude as a function of r, for Rin < r < Rout?

for this problem, when you find qinside, do you integrate from Rin to r or from Rin to Rout? I'm confused because i would have expected it to be the latter, but in the solutions they integrate from Rin to r. can someone please explain this?

also, if you try to find the e-field where r > Rout, do you integrate from r to Rout?

Solution is here (problem II):
http://www.physics.gatech.edu/~em92/Classes/Fall2011/2212GHJ/main/quiz_help/200908/q2s.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just use Gauss' theorem. The surface has radius r, and
q(inside) is whatever's inside!
 
rude man said:
Just use Gauss' theorem. The surface has radius r, and
q(inside) is whatever's inside!

since in the example in the document it asks for Rin < r < Rout.. why does it integrate from Rout to r??
 
It doesn't. It integrates from Rin to r.
 
rude man said:
It doesn't. It integrates from Rin to r.

but why not Rin to Rout?
 
Because ity asks for the field at Rin < r < Rout, not AT Rout.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K