Electric field in a second dielectric given a 2 dielectric system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field in a two-dielectric system, specifically determining the tangential and normal electric fields at the boundary. The approach involves using Maxwell's equations, particularly the integral forms for electric displacement and electric fields. The final results indicate that for the first dielectric with permittivity ε1 equal to 2ε0, the electric field E2 in the second dielectric is half of E1, yielding E2 as i + (3/2)j + 2k V/m. The calculations confirm that the normal components of the electric displacement fields D are equal across the boundary due to the absence of surface charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations, specifically the integral forms for electric fields and displacement.
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and their permittivity values.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly operations involving electric field vectors.
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, including boundary conditions at dielectric interfaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Maxwell's equations in dielectric materials.
  • Learn about boundary conditions for electric fields at dielectric interfaces.
  • Explore the concept of electric displacement field D and its relationship to electric field E.
  • Investigate the effects of surface charge on electric fields in multi-dielectric systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists studying electromagnetism, and anyone involved in the analysis of electric fields in dielectric materials.

willDavidson
Messages
50
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
The boundary between dielectric regions is defined by the plane ##x+2y+3z=10##. The region containing the origin is refereed to as medium 1 ##(x+2y+3z=10)## and is assumed to have a permittivity ##\epsilon_1=2\epsilon_0##. Medium 2 is assumed to be the free space of vacuum. The fields in both regions are static and uniform. If ##E_1=2i+3j+4k## ##V/m##. Find E2. No surface charge is presented at the boundary.
Relevant Equations
##E_1 \epsilon_1=E_2 \epsilon_2##
##\oint_S E \cdot dl=0##
##\oint_S D \cdot ds##
I tried approaching this by finding the tangential and normal electric fields. Is this the correct approach? I've attached a drawing of the surface provided.

##\oint_S E \cdot dl=0##
##E_{tan1}\Delta x-E_{tan2}\Delta x=0##

We know that
##E_{tan1}=E_{tan2}

Next, we can find the normal component using
####\oint_S D \cdot ds##
##D_{N1}\cdot dS-D_{N2}\cdot dS=Q##
##D_{N1}-D_{N2}= \frac Q {dS}##
##D_{N1}-D_{N2}=\sigma##

Since the problem defined no surface charge at the boundary
##D_{N1}-D_{N2}=0##
##D_{N1}=D_{N2}##

Now we use
##D=\epsilon E##
##E_1 \epsilon_1=E_2 \epsilon_2##
##E_2=\frac {\epsilon_1} {\epsilon_2}E_1##

Solution
##\epsilon_1=2\epsilon_0##
##E_2=\frac 1 2 E_1##
##E_1=2i+3j+4k V/m##
##E_2=\frac 1 2 (2i+3j+4k) V/m##
##E_2=i+\frac 3 2 j+2k##
 

Attachments

  • HW.PNG
    HW.PNG
    2.8 KB · Views: 154
Physics news on Phys.org
May I suggest computing En1 and Et1 at the boundary?
 
I'm sorry. My mistake. I didn't realize the post was so old . The right panel presented it as without answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K