Electric field in a spherical shell

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Gauss's Law to determine the electric field within a spherical shell. The user initially miscalculated the electric field by confusing the total charge of the shell with the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface. The correct formula for the electric field, derived from Gauss's Law, is given as $$E=\frac{Q}{e*4\pi*x^2}$$, but the user acknowledges a mistake in their approach. The clarification provided emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between total charge and enclosed charge when applying Gauss's Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge distributions
  • Basic knowledge of spherical geometry
  • Concept of Gaussian surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about charge distributions in spherical shells
  • Explore the concept of Gaussian surfaces and their significance in electrostatics
  • Investigate common mistakes in applying Gauss's Law and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetism, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and Gauss's Law applications.

curiosissimo
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
We have a spherical shell with 2 radiuses $$R_1<R_2$$ The charge Q is distributed uniformly in the part of the sphere between R1 and R2. The inner space of the sphere ($$0<y<R_1$$) has no charge What is the electric field in the spherical shell?
Relevant Equations
Gaussian theorem
So for the Gaussian theorem we know that $$ \frac{Q}{e} = \vec E \cdot \vec S $$ Q's value is known so we don't need to express it as $$Q=(4/3)\pi*(R_2 ^3-R_1 ^3)*d$$ where d is the density of the charge in the volume. I've expressed the surface $$S=4\pi*x^2$$ where x is the distance of a point in the shell from the center of the sphere. So we simply get $$E=\frac{Q}{e*4\pi*x^2}$$ but it's wrong and I really don't know why. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, curiosissimo. Welcome to PF.

Don't confuse the total charge of the shell with the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: curiosissimo
TSny said:
Hello, curiosissimo. Welcome to PF.

Don't confuse the total charge of the shell with the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface.
Of course! What a silly mistake! Thank you very much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
719
Replies
5
Views
870
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K