Electric Field in Circuits/Conductors

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatic conditions, there is no electric field within a conductor because free charges remain at rest, preventing any drift. However, when a circuit is activated, an electric field is established in the conducting wires due to the electromotive force, causing the free charges to drift and create current. This transition from electrostatic conditions to a dynamic state occurs when a voltage is applied, leading to the emergence of the electric field. The confusion arises from the timing of the electric field's creation relative to the movement of charge carriers. Ultimately, the electric field is necessary for maintaining current flow, as it counteracts resistive forces within the conductor.
SeannyBoi71
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
A little curiosity here. In my Electricity and Magnetism class, for the first half of the semester we were taught strictly: there can never be an electric field in a conductor. Alright, it makes sense the way it is explained, fair enough.

Now we come to circuits, and are told that there is an electric field in the conducting wires that creates current, generated by the electromotive force. My question is, why is there an electric field in these wires? I thought it wasn't possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There cannot be an electric field in a conductor in electrostatic conditions. The reason is simple: if there were an electric field the free charges (which characterise a conductor) will drift in the direction of the force due to the field, so the conditions couldn't be electrostatic after all!

When there is a current, i.e. a drifting of free charges, there must be an electric field, or the charges would quickly lose their drift velocity, because of resistive forces due to collisions with the lattice.
 
Philip Wood said:
There cannot be an electric field in a conductor in electrostatic conditions. The reason is simple: if there were an electric field the free charges (which characterise a conductor) will drift in the direction of the force due to the field, so the conditions couldn't be electrostatic after all!

When there is a current, i.e. a drifting of free charges, there must be an electric field, or the charges would quickly lose their drift velocity, because of resistive forces due to collisions with the lattice.

I'm unfamiliar with the term "electrostatic conditions"... does this mean that charge carriers are at rest?
 
SeannyBoi71 said:
I'm unfamiliar with the term "electrostatic conditions"... does this mean that charge carriers are at rest?

Sure I guess. It just means that it is a time-static problem (no currents). Magnetostatics has static currents (currents that don't change with time) so wouldn't be the same thing as time-static.
 
Well I'm still confused then. Before there is a current, everything is at rest. It is an electrostatic condition then, so there is no electric field. How then, all of a sudden, is there magically a field, and the conductor is no longer electrostatic? Do the charge carriers start moving before the electric field is produced, or something?
 
Maybe I'm missing your point, but the free carriers start to drift when a field is applied, for example by connecting a battery across the conductor.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top