Electric Field In Medium Clarification

AI Thread Summary
In a vacuum, the electric displacement field D is described by the equation D = ε0E + P, where P is the polarization that equals zero in vacuum. It is established that the electric field E in a vacuum is greater than in an insulating medium, assuming P does not oppose the electric field direction. However, in certain metamaterials, P can oppose the electric field, leading to different behavior for oscillating electromagnetic fields at specific frequencies. This clarification highlights the complexity of electric fields in various media. Understanding these nuances is crucial for applications in advanced materials and electromagnetic theory.
Danen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I just wanted to clarify:

Because D = ε0E + P

P being zero in vacuum
and ∇D is constant regardless of medium

if D was originally in a vacuum, the corresponding E would be greater than if it were in an insulating medium. So,

E in vacuum > E in medium
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not if you use materials where P is opposed to the direction of the electric field. That can happen in metamaterials for oscillating electromagnetic fields of specific frequencies.
 
Thanks for clearing that up mfb.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top